From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@argo.co.il>
Cc: Gerald Britton <gbritton@doomcom.org>,
Michael Smith <msmith@xiph.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Wingo <wingo@fluendo.com>
Subject: Re: gettimeofday() jumping into the future
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 13:09:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46CDE981.9030506@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46CD85AC.7050805@argo.co.il>
Avi Kivity wrote:
> Gerald Britton wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:08:27PM +0200, Michael Smith wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We've been seeing some strange behaviour on some of our applications
>>> recently. I've tracked this down to gettimeofday() returning spurious
>>> values occasionally.
>>>
>>> Specifically, gettimeofday() will suddenly, for a single call, return
>>> a value about 4398 seconds (~1 hour 13 minutes) in the future. The
>>> following call goes back to a normal value.
>>>
>>
>> I have seen this as well (on a 2.6.20.4 kernel). The value returned was
>> always identical each time the glitch occured (just a little over 4398
>> seconds). I saw it watching packet receive timestamps and on the
>> system in
>> question, it would generally hit this problem around once a minute. When
>> moving forward to a 2.6.21 kernel, the problem seemed to go away (also
>> back
>> to 2.6.17, unfortunately I didn't have any sample points inbetween).
>> I didn't have free time to spend bisecting attempting to find when the
>> behavior started or stopped.
>
> That value, in nanoseconds, is 0x3fffd3a4c00. The next second is
> 0x40038d51600. Is the wraparound at (0x400 << 32) significant?
>
This would be consistent with an off-by-2^32 error. In particular, if
either a CPU bug or a code bug could at some point produce 0x400fxxxxxxx
in between then that would produce exactly the observed characteristics.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-23 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-23 11:08 gettimeofday() jumping into the future Michael Smith
2007-08-23 11:36 ` Gerald Britton
2007-08-23 13:03 ` Avi Kivity
2007-08-23 20:09 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-08-23 20:07 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-23 11:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-08-23 12:20 ` Michael Smith
2007-08-23 18:47 ` john stultz
2007-08-25 16:44 ` Michael Smith
2008-03-30 21:17 ` Tim Ricketts
2008-03-31 7:18 ` Andi Kleen
2008-04-03 11:47 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2008-04-03 12:22 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2008-04-03 12:44 ` James Courtier-Dutton
2008-04-11 23:11 ` john stultz
2008-03-31 8:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-03-31 16:03 ` John Stultz
2008-04-02 11:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-02 23:57 ` Karsten Wiese
2008-04-03 6:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2008-04-02 4:26 ` Mihai Donțu
2008-04-02 4:27 ` Mihai Donțu
[not found] <47F3F313.7030803@vmware.com>
2008-04-02 22:40 ` Tim Mann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46CDE981.9030506@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=avi@argo.co.il \
--cc=gbritton@doomcom.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=msmith@xiph.org \
--cc=wingo@fluendo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox