* [PATCH 2/2] NBD: allow hung network I/O to be cancelled
2007-08-24 17:06 [PATCH 1/2] NBD: set uninitialized devices to size 0 Paul Clements
@ 2007-08-24 17:40 ` Paul Clements
2007-08-24 18:13 ` Mike Snitzer
2007-08-24 23:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] NBD: set uninitialized devices to size 0 Andrew Morton
1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Paul Clements @ 2007-08-24 17:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: linux-kernel, david, Wouter Verhelst, Corey Minyard
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 720 bytes --]
This patch allows NBD I/O to be cancelled when a network outage occurs.
Previously, I/O would just hang, and if enough I/O was hung in nbd, the
system (at least user-level) would completely hang until a TCP timeout
(default, 15 minutes) occurred.
The patch introduces a new ioctl NBD_SET_TIMEOUT that allows a transmit
timeout value (in seconds) to be specified. Any network send that
exceeds the timeout will be cancelled and the nbd connection will be
shut down. I've tested with various timeout values and 6 seconds seems
to be a good choice for the timeout. If the NBD_SET_TIMEOUT ioctl is not
called, you get the old (I/O hang) behavior.
Patch applies and was tested against 2.6.23-rc2-mm2.
Thanks,
Paul
[-- Attachment #2: nbd_xmit_timeout_26.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 7309 bytes --]
Signed-Off-By: Paul Clements <paul.clements@steeleye.com>
--- ./drivers/block/nbd.c.SIZE_ZERO 2007-08-16 13:08:06.000000000 -0400
+++ ./drivers/block/nbd.c 2007-08-23 16:42:09.000000000 -0400
@@ -113,12 +113,42 @@ static void nbd_end_request(struct reque
spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
}
+static void sock_shutdown(struct nbd_device *lo, int lock)
+{
+ /* Forcibly shutdown the socket causing all listeners
+ * to error
+ *
+ * FIXME: This code is duplicated from sys_shutdown, but
+ * there should be a more generic interface rather than
+ * calling socket ops directly here */
+ if (lock)
+ mutex_lock(&lo->tx_lock);
+ if (lo->sock) {
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: shutting down socket\n",
+ lo->disk->disk_name);
+ lo->sock->ops->shutdown(lo->sock, SEND_SHUTDOWN|RCV_SHUTDOWN);
+ lo->sock = NULL;
+ }
+ if (lock)
+ mutex_unlock(&lo->tx_lock);
+}
+
+static void nbd_xmit_timeout(unsigned long arg)
+{
+ struct task_struct *task = (struct task_struct *)arg;
+
+ printk(KERN_WARNING "nbd: killing hung xmit (%s, pid: %d)\n",
+ task->comm, task->pid);
+ force_sig(SIGKILL, task);
+}
+
/*
* Send or receive packet.
*/
-static int sock_xmit(struct socket *sock, int send, void *buf, int size,
+static int sock_xmit(struct nbd_device *lo, int send, void *buf, int size,
int msg_flags)
{
+ struct socket *sock = lo->sock;
int result;
struct msghdr msg;
struct kvec iov;
@@ -139,9 +169,20 @@ static int sock_xmit(struct socket *sock
msg.msg_controllen = 0;
msg.msg_flags = msg_flags | MSG_NOSIGNAL;
- if (send)
+ if (send) {
+ struct timer_list ti;
+
+ if (lo->xmit_timeout) {
+ init_timer(&ti);
+ ti.function = nbd_xmit_timeout;
+ ti.data = (unsigned long)current;
+ ti.expires = jiffies + lo->xmit_timeout;
+ add_timer(&ti);
+ }
result = kernel_sendmsg(sock, &msg, &iov, 1, size);
- else
+ if (lo->xmit_timeout)
+ del_timer_sync(&ti);
+ } else
result = kernel_recvmsg(sock, &msg, &iov, 1, size, 0);
if (signal_pending(current)) {
@@ -150,6 +191,7 @@ static int sock_xmit(struct socket *sock
current->pid, current->comm,
dequeue_signal_lock(current, ¤t->blocked, &info));
result = -EINTR;
+ sock_shutdown(lo, !send);
break;
}
@@ -167,23 +209,22 @@ static int sock_xmit(struct socket *sock
return result;
}
-static inline int sock_send_bvec(struct socket *sock, struct bio_vec *bvec,
+static inline int sock_send_bvec(struct nbd_device *lo, struct bio_vec *bvec,
int flags)
{
int result;
void *kaddr = kmap(bvec->bv_page);
- result = sock_xmit(sock, 1, kaddr + bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len,
- flags);
+ result = sock_xmit(lo, 1, kaddr + bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len, flags);
kunmap(bvec->bv_page);
return result;
}
+/* always call with the tx_lock held */
static int nbd_send_req(struct nbd_device *lo, struct request *req)
{
int result, i, flags;
struct nbd_request request;
unsigned long size = req->nr_sectors << 9;
- struct socket *sock = lo->sock;
request.magic = htonl(NBD_REQUEST_MAGIC);
request.type = htonl(nbd_cmd(req));
@@ -196,8 +237,8 @@ static int nbd_send_req(struct nbd_devic
nbdcmd_to_ascii(nbd_cmd(req)),
(unsigned long long)req->sector << 9,
req->nr_sectors << 9);
- result = sock_xmit(sock, 1, &request, sizeof(request),
- (nbd_cmd(req) == NBD_CMD_WRITE)? MSG_MORE: 0);
+ result = sock_xmit(lo, 1, &request, sizeof(request),
+ (nbd_cmd(req) == NBD_CMD_WRITE) ? MSG_MORE : 0);
if (result <= 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Send control failed (result %d)\n",
lo->disk->disk_name, result);
@@ -219,7 +260,7 @@ static int nbd_send_req(struct nbd_devic
dprintk(DBG_TX, "%s: request %p: sending %d bytes data\n",
lo->disk->disk_name, req,
bvec->bv_len);
- result = sock_send_bvec(sock, bvec, flags);
+ result = sock_send_bvec(lo, bvec, flags);
if (result <= 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Send data failed (result %d)\n",
lo->disk->disk_name,
@@ -261,11 +302,11 @@ out:
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
-static inline int sock_recv_bvec(struct socket *sock, struct bio_vec *bvec)
+static inline int sock_recv_bvec(struct nbd_device *lo, struct bio_vec *bvec)
{
int result;
void *kaddr = kmap(bvec->bv_page);
- result = sock_xmit(sock, 0, kaddr + bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len,
+ result = sock_xmit(lo, 0, kaddr + bvec->bv_offset, bvec->bv_len,
MSG_WAITALL);
kunmap(bvec->bv_page);
return result;
@@ -277,10 +318,9 @@ static struct request *nbd_read_stat(str
int result;
struct nbd_reply reply;
struct request *req;
- struct socket *sock = lo->sock;
reply.magic = 0;
- result = sock_xmit(sock, 0, &reply, sizeof(reply), MSG_WAITALL);
+ result = sock_xmit(lo, 0, &reply, sizeof(reply), MSG_WAITALL);
if (result <= 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Receive control failed (result %d)\n",
lo->disk->disk_name, result);
@@ -322,7 +362,7 @@ static struct request *nbd_read_stat(str
rq_for_each_bio(bio, req) {
struct bio_vec *bvec;
bio_for_each_segment(bvec, bio, i) {
- result = sock_recv_bvec(sock, bvec);
+ result = sock_recv_bvec(lo, bvec);
if (result <= 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: Receive data failed (result %d)\n",
lo->disk->disk_name,
@@ -401,6 +441,7 @@ static void nbd_clear_que(struct nbd_dev
}
}
+
/*
* We always wait for result of write, for now. It would be nice to make it optional
* in future
@@ -511,7 +552,9 @@ static int nbd_ioctl(struct inode *inode
sreq.nr_sectors = 0;
if (!lo->sock)
return -EINVAL;
+ mutex_lock(&lo->tx_lock);
nbd_send_req(lo, &sreq);
+ mutex_unlock(&lo->tx_lock);
return 0;
case NBD_CLEAR_SOCK:
@@ -555,6 +598,9 @@ static int nbd_ioctl(struct inode *inode
set_blocksize(inode->i_bdev, lo->blksize);
set_capacity(lo->disk, lo->bytesize >> 9);
return 0;
+ case NBD_SET_TIMEOUT:
+ lo->xmit_timeout = arg * HZ;
+ return 0;
case NBD_SET_SIZE_BLOCKS:
lo->bytesize = ((u64) arg) * lo->blksize;
inode->i_bdev->bd_inode->i_size = lo->bytesize;
@@ -567,22 +613,7 @@ static int nbd_ioctl(struct inode *inode
error = nbd_do_it(lo);
if (error)
return error;
- /* on return tidy up in case we have a signal */
- /* Forcibly shutdown the socket causing all listeners
- * to error
- *
- * FIXME: This code is duplicated from sys_shutdown, but
- * there should be a more generic interface rather than
- * calling socket ops directly here */
- mutex_lock(&lo->tx_lock);
- if (lo->sock) {
- printk(KERN_WARNING "%s: shutting down socket\n",
- lo->disk->disk_name);
- lo->sock->ops->shutdown(lo->sock,
- SEND_SHUTDOWN|RCV_SHUTDOWN);
- lo->sock = NULL;
- }
- mutex_unlock(&lo->tx_lock);
+ sock_shutdown(lo, 1);
file = lo->file;
lo->file = NULL;
nbd_clear_que(lo);
--- ./include/linux/nbd.h.PRISTINE 2007-08-22 13:15:45.000000000 -0400
+++ ./include/linux/nbd.h 2007-08-22 13:17:02.000000000 -0400
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
#define NBD_PRINT_DEBUG _IO( 0xab, 6 )
#define NBD_SET_SIZE_BLOCKS _IO( 0xab, 7 )
#define NBD_DISCONNECT _IO( 0xab, 8 )
+#define NBD_SET_TIMEOUT _IO( 0xab, 9 )
enum {
NBD_CMD_READ = 0,
@@ -65,6 +66,7 @@ struct nbd_device {
int blksize;
u64 bytesize;
pid_t pid; /* pid of nbd-client, if attached */
+ int xmit_timeout;
};
#endif
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread