linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Guillaume Chazarain <guichaz@yahoo.fr>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jay Lan <jlan@engr.sgi.com>, Jonathan Lim <jlim@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add all thread stats for TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_TGID
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:28:44 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D10884.6040401@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070825171039.3bc73781@localhost.localdomain>

Guillaume Chazarain wrote:
> Le Mon, 20 Aug 2007 22:31:08 +0530,
> Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com> a écrit :
> 
>>> --- a/kernel/taskstats.c	Sat Aug 18 17:15:17 2007 -0700
>>> +++ b/kernel/taskstats.c	Sun Aug 19 17:20:15 2007 +0200
>>> @@ -246,6 +246,8 @@ static int fill_tgid(pid_t tgid, struct 
>>>
>>>  		stats->nvcsw += tsk->nvcsw;
>>>  		stats->nivcsw += tsk->nivcsw;
>>> +		bacct_add_tsk(stats, tsk);
>>> +		xacct_add_tsk(stats, tsk);
>> I'm afraid this is still not good enough. bacct_add_tsk() will assign
>> values and do nothing in the loop (HINT: no summation).
> 
> Hi Balbir, thank you for your review. I agree with everything you said
> and am on my way to do it as time permits, but I have some trouble
> understanding this part. You stated that bacct_add_tsk() would overwrite
> the stats of each thread in the tgid stats, but the other part of the
> patch is the (actually wrong) combination of stats in xxx_add_tsk()
> using min/max/sum.
> 

Hi, Guillaume,

The CSA code was written by Jay Lan, but I'll see if I can answer your
questions. In the current implementation, CSA does not use TGID exit
notifications. In fill_pid(), both bacct_add_tsk() and xacct_add_tsk()
are called (which is correct), they complement each other.

The code needs refactoring to ensure that they can work together
in the fill_tgid() scenario.

> Also, I don't understand why the code to update btime:
> 
>         /* calculate task elapsed time in timespec */
>         do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(&uptime);
>         ts = timespec_sub(uptime, tsk->start_time);
> 	...
>         stats->ac_btime = get_seconds() - ts.tv_sec;
> 
> does not simply use tsk->start_time or tsk->real_start_time without
> comparing it to the current time.
> 

>From what I understand, task->start_time and task->real_start_time
are taken from the realtime clock. The accounting in CSA seems
to be very similar to the accounting done in do_acct_process()
(kernel/acct.c).

Jay/Jonathan any comments?


-- 
	Warm Regards,
	Balbir Singh
	Linux Technology Center
	IBM, ISTL

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-26  4:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-02 13:53 [PATCH] Add all thread stats for TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_TGID Guillaume Chazarain
2007-08-02 19:04 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-19 19:34   ` Guillaume Chazarain
2007-08-20 17:01     ` Balbir Singh
2007-08-25 15:10       ` Guillaume Chazarain
2007-08-26  4:58         ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2007-08-26  9:44           ` Guillaume Chazarain
2007-08-31  3:02           ` Jonathan Lim
2007-08-31  7:24             ` Balbir Singh
2007-08-31 12:35               ` Add all thread stats for TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_TGID (v3) Guillaume Chazarain
2007-09-13  0:18                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-15 18:42                   ` Add all thread stats for TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_TGID (v4) Guillaume Chazarain
2007-09-17 22:23                     ` Add all thread stats for TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_TGID (v5) Guillaume Chazarain
2007-09-18 15:29                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-09-20  6:20                       ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-20  8:54                         ` Balbir Singh
2007-09-20 12:16                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2007-09-20 12:17                             ` Balbir Singh
2007-09-07 23:37               ` [PATCH] Add all thread stats for TASKSTATS_CMD_ATTR_TGID Jonathan Lim
2007-09-10 13:03                 ` Guillaume Chazarain
2007-08-15  7:15 ` Balbir Singh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-02 13:34 Guillaume Chazarain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46D10884.6040401@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=guichaz@yahoo.fr \
    --cc=jlan@engr.sgi.com \
    --cc=jlim@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).