From: Michal Piotrowski <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com>
Cc: "Michal Piotrowski" <michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com>,
"Björn Steinbrink" <B.Steinbrink@gmx.de>,
eranian@hpl.hp.com, ak@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:45:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1187904169.2435.83.camel@dhcp193.mvista.com>
Daniel Walker pisze:
[snip]
> Have you considered maintaining all the lists in Bugzilla?
Yes, I have considered it.
Bugzilla sucks when it comes to tracking things. There is
a regression field, but there are no difference between
2.6.22 and 2.6.23 regression.
Most people are reporting bugs through LKML:
- 23 regressions with reference to LKML
- 4 regressions with reference to Bugzilla
> If you had a
> search of open bugs they would just fall of the list as they get
> closed..
Unfortunately, the world is not perfect.
Is anyone interested in maintaining KR list for stable releases?
>
> Daniel
>
>
Regards,
Michal
--
LOG
http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-27 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-08 0:06 nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21 Daniel Walker
2007-08-08 14:20 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-08-08 15:20 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-20 16:44 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-23 20:08 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-23 21:22 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 0:45 ` Michal Piotrowski [this message]
2007-08-27 7:51 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 9:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-08-27 11:35 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 16:09 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:05 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 11:38 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 12:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-08-27 15:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 15:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:26 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 15:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 17:02 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:17 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 19:12 ` David Rees
2007-08-29 7:42 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-29 22:23 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-29 23:59 ` Natalie Protasevich
2007-08-30 8:51 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-30 15:24 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? Stefan Richter
[not found] ` <32209efe0708300950r5787402l4d02cedd862314fd@mail.gmail.com>
2007-08-30 22:11 ` Al Boldi
2007-09-03 12:29 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-03 13:20 ` Stefan Richter
2007-08-30 15:54 ` Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21) Bill Davidsen
2007-09-03 12:43 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 16:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 16:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 16:52 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 17:08 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 18:26 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 8:11 ` David Rees
2007-08-27 11:42 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 14:39 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 15:11 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27 17:54 ` nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21 Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 17:55 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-27 22:55 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-27 23:07 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 9:12 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 14:34 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 17:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 18:30 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 19:46 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-28 20:13 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-29 21:24 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-30 1:21 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-30 21:05 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-31 14:43 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 16:21 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-08-31 16:35 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-31 18:06 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 0:24 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 1:00 ` Björn Steinbrink
2007-09-01 1:36 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 10:19 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 19:51 ` Stephane Eranian
2007-09-01 20:32 ` Andi Kleen
2007-09-01 20:46 ` Daniel Walker
2007-09-01 9:12 ` Andi Kleen
2007-08-28 20:26 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-28 20:21 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46D21E8E.4000003@googlemail.com \
--to=michal.k.k.piotrowski@gmail.com \
--cc=B.Steinbrink@gmx.de \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=eranian@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox