From: Jes Sorensen <jes@sgi.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>,
Tech Board Discuss
<Tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Isaacson <adi@hexapodia.org>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com>,
ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org
Subject: Re: [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 14:12:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D2BFC8.7000904@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070827050432.06f9590f@laptopd505.fenrus.org>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 12:01:55 +0200
>
>> But replacing the flawed KS list with one based on actual
>> contributors, from the git logs as I proposed last week, doesn't seem
>> silly.
>
> to some degree the KS list is based on that git logs thing ;)
Yes, as well as 12 committee members, of which 5 didn't even comply with
their own git commit requirement last time I checked. Not to mention the
10 seats sold to sponsors (presuming it goes like in previous years,
with each sponsor being awarded one grease slot per sponsorship).
Based on the published list of invitees (which didn't seem to include
the seats sold off) that means 25% of the people who can vote for the
TAB were not given a vote based on their contributions.
Of course this matches the voting system in some countries, but just
because a lot of places rely on broken systems, that shouldn't encourage
the TAB to do the same.
Jes
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-27 12:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 15:22 Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Elections James Bottomley
2007-08-22 20:56 ` Scott Preece
2007-08-22 21:26 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 21:22 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-22 21:33 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " Chris Wright
2007-08-22 21:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-22 21:44 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 21:43 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 21:58 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-22 22:14 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-22 23:47 ` James Morris
2007-08-23 1:27 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-23 2:12 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-23 2:45 ` James Morris
2007-08-23 3:49 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-23 11:05 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-23 13:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-22 22:44 ` Matthew Garrett
2007-08-23 0:26 ` [Ksummit-2007-discuss] " Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-23 0:37 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-23 0:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-23 1:19 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-23 1:35 ` [Tech-board-discuss] " James Bottomley
2007-08-24 1:27 ` Andy Isaacson
2007-08-24 2:34 ` Josh Boyer
2007-08-24 2:52 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-24 2:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 3:22 ` Matt Mackall
2007-08-24 15:57 ` Greg KH
2007-08-24 16:10 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-24 18:29 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 23:48 ` Greg KH
2007-08-25 0:01 ` [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: LinuxFoundation " Luck, Tony
2007-08-25 0:03 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-25 0:11 ` James Bottomley
2007-08-25 0:53 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-25 1:08 ` Dave Jones
2007-08-25 0:03 ` [Tech-board-discuss] Re: [Ksummit-2007-discuss] Re: Linux Foundation " Alan Cox
2007-08-27 10:01 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-27 12:04 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-27 12:12 ` Jes Sorensen [this message]
2007-08-27 15:05 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-29 2:18 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-29 2:18 ` Daniel Walker
2007-08-29 2:56 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-28 22:16 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-29 11:08 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-29 17:58 ` Bdale Garbee
2007-08-24 4:54 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-08-24 11:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 12:13 ` Jes Sorensen
2007-08-24 13:08 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 10:45 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-28 22:59 ` Daniel Phillips
2007-08-29 3:04 ` Theodore Tso
2007-08-29 3:38 ` Nick Piggin
2007-08-29 11:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-29 22:55 ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-24 10:41 ` Alan Cox
2007-08-24 13:42 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-24 13:57 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-25 17:59 ` Linux Foundation Technical Advisory Board Election Results James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46D2BFC8.7000904@sgi.com \
--to=jes@sgi.com \
--cc=Tech-board-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=adi@hexapodia.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=jwboyer@gmail.com \
--cc=ksummit-2007-discuss@thunk.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).