Re: Who wants to maintain KR list for stable releases? (was Re: nmi_watchdog=2 regression in 2.6.21)

Michal Piotrowski
2007-08-27T15:26:29Z

On 27/08/07, Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-08-27 at 13:38 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> > On 27/08/07, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
[..]
> > > I'm not sure that we need one, really. Any bugs in a stable release can be
> > > handled via email and/or bugzilla as we are presently doing?
> > >
> > > What I'm concerned about is that regressions which we didn't fix are just
> > > getting lost. Is anyone taking care to ensure that they are getting
> > > transitioned into bugzilla for tracking?
> >
> > I can copy all regression reports into Bugzilla after each release.
>
> Should we get the regression field fix before? Or had you planned on
> just bypassing that completely ?

IMO solution proposed by David http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/27/21 seems
to be most reasonable.

>
> Daniel
>
>

Regards,
Michal

--
LOG