public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gabriel Barazer <gabriel@oxeva.fr>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jkar8572@users.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: nfs4 filesystem mounted via the "bind" option reports wrong	fstype
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:08:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D32F2F.3050408@oxeva.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070827193242.GJ3118@fieldses.org>

On 08/27/2007 9:32:42 PM +0200, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> 
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 08:15:07PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 02:40:59PM -0400, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>  
>>> There's no reason not to just mount server:/exports/data directly at
>>> /home/data; the bind mounts are just a workaround for the somewhat
>>> primitive exports facility on the server side.
>> Bullshit.  Bindings are first-class operations on _client_, regardless
>> of fs types involved.
> 
> I know.  Did I say something to the contrary?
> 
> Maybe I was too terse; in more detail: the original poster appears to be
> mounting server:/exports/data by first mounting server:/ somewhere and
> then bind-mounting the exports/data someplace else.  I couldn't see an
> obvious reason they'd be using two steps instead of just performing a
> single mount of server:/exports/data.
> 
> So my assumption was that this was due to a confused memory of some
> server-side setup instructions. (On the server side, nfs4 export setup
> often requires the administrator to do some extra bind mounts which
> shouldn't really be necessary.)

Right. When setting up the clients, I remembered these "bind" mount 
things, and applied the same client-side because at this time I had 
other bugs for which I thought "bind" mount was the solution. In fact 
it's not, but as nfs4 is seen as a unique filesystem and I had several 
exported volumes, It was easier to mount the nfsv4 pseudoroot, then 
"bind" mount all the volumes from it.

But the bug's still here, and since these additional mounts appear 
"magically" in /proc/mounts, I don't know where to look at in the kernel 
source. The nfsv4 client code must have somewhere a kind of nfs4 
automounter for "nohide" volumes. A bit ugly IMHO, but the only way to 
show quotas for separates nfsv4 exported volumes too.

Gabriel

      reply	other threads:[~2007-08-27 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-27 18:32 nfs4 filesystem mounted via the "bind" option reports wrong fstype Gabriel Barazer
2007-08-27 18:40 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-27 19:15   ` Al Viro
2007-08-27 19:32     ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-27 20:08       ` Gabriel Barazer [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46D32F2F.3050408@oxeva.fr \
    --to=gabriel@oxeva.fr \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=jkar8572@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox