From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Cc: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>,
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
akpm <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
bos@serpentine.com, werner@almesberger.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 16:21:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46D750E3.2060605@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070830161316.b04f041d.randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007 15:41:27 -0700 H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
>> Rob Landley wrote:
>>> On Thursday 30 August 2007 1:28:17 pm Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 30 Aug 2007, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>> The old "ramdisk=<ram_size>" has been changed to
>>>>> "ramdisk_size=<ram_size>" to make it clearer. The original
>>>>> "ramdisk=<ram_size>" has been kept around for compatibility reasons,
>>>>> but it may be removed in the future.
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> i just the other day submitted a patch to remove that backward
>>>> compatibility, and the m68k portion of it has already been acked by
>>>> geert uytterhoeven.
>
> I couldn't find it. Can you provide a pointer to it?
>
>>> Could you mention it in feature-removal-schedule.txt? (People check that for
>>> warning of upcoming changes that impact existing code. They may not notice
>>> something elsewhere after they've got it working...)
>>>
>> The same objection applies to this as to the previous one. In that
>> respect, an Ack from a maintainer of an almost unused architecture is
>> meaningless (sorry, Geert.)
>
> Peter, what are you objecting to, Rob's comment, Robert's comment,
> Robert's patch, or my patch?
>
Robert's patch.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-30 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-30 18:20 [PATCH] docs: ramdisk/initrd/initramfs corrections Randy Dunlap
2007-08-30 18:28 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-08-30 23:36 ` Rob Landley
2007-08-30 22:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-08-30 23:13 ` Randy Dunlap
2007-08-30 23:21 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2007-08-31 5:41 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-08-31 5:34 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-09-02 8:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2007-08-31 7:29 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-08-31 14:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-08-31 14:20 ` Robert P. J. Day
2007-08-30 19:13 ` Bryan O'Sullivan
2007-08-30 23:29 ` Rob Landley
2007-08-31 0:00 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46D750E3.2060605@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bos@serpentine.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=rpjday@mindspring.com \
--cc=werner@almesberger.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox