From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756043AbXIAUkX (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:40:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755784AbXIAUkH (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:40:07 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:38528 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754312AbXIAUkG (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:40:06 -0400 Message-ID: <46D9CE20.9060603@garzik.org> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 16:40:00 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Shane CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: intel-rng on modern hardware References: <20070901194426.GA32713@csy.ca> In-Reply-To: <20070901194426.GA32713@csy.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.3 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.9 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.3 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Shane wrote: > Just wondering if there is a newer version of intel-rng out > of tree or whether modern Intel chipsets have a usable RNG. > I haven't been able to get intel-rng loading (no such > device) on anything from the p965, p975 or p35 chipsets. No modern ICH chipset has an RNG, AFAIK. Jeff