From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932178AbXIAU6W (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:58:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755784AbXIAU6G (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:58:06 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:57913 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755778AbXIAU6F (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Sep 2007 16:58:05 -0400 Message-ID: <46D9D23A.8050704@zytor.com> Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2007 21:57:30 +0100 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Garzik CC: Shane , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: intel-rng on modern hardware References: <20070901194426.GA32713@csy.ca> <46D9CE20.9060603@garzik.org> In-Reply-To: <46D9CE20.9060603@garzik.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik wrote: > Shane wrote: >> Just wondering if there is a newer version of intel-rng out >> of tree or whether modern Intel chipsets have a usable RNG. I haven't >> been able to get intel-rng loading (no such >> device) on anything from the p965, p975 or p35 chipsets. > > No modern ICH chipset has an RNG, AFAIK. > Which is a major lossage :( -hpa