public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	john stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT] convert RCU Preempt tasklet into softirq.
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2007 12:52:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E03E40.80801@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070608200058.GC18399@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 03:43:48PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Fri, 2007-06-08 at 12:36 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 08, 2007 at 11:27:08AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>>> The first time I compiled it, I forgot the ';' and got a warning there.
>>>> But the warning also included "declaring structure softirq_action in
>>>> prototype", so I fixed both the ';' and added the struct. I can try
>>>> compile without it. But I also know that adding #include <interrupt.h>
>>>> in rcupreempt.h caused issues too.
>>> If I leave out both the "struct softirq_action" and the
>>> rcu_process_callbacks() declaration,, it compiles for me.
>>>
>>> So I guess the rcu_process_callbacks() should be declared static...
>> OK, I can update the patch to reflect that. Remember, I didn't learn
>> anything from doing this patch, so I have no idea why
>> rcu_procell_callbacks was global. I was just keeping to the norm. :-)
> 
> Hey, -I- learned something from your doing the patch -- namely that
> rcu_process_callbacks() was needlessly non-static.  ;-)
> 
>> Actually, I'll make a separate patch for this change. This is a
>> different issue.
> 
> Sounds good!
> 

Paul,

I had a test run of a kernel using Steven's patch (RCU using tasklets) going over the
weekend. It looks like it made it through running racer for 24hrs without a panic,
but I'm not entirely convinced (since my reservation of the test system expired on
Saturday and I didn't look at it until Wednesday; bad Clark, no doughnut).

I've got another test running now and I'll be able to poke around on the system
tomorrow morning to see if in fact there were no RCU related Oops'en. I'll let you
know what we find.

Clark


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG4D5AHyuj/+TTEp0RAkfxAKDmGHLgTEaVrclCPQfytJZbF9hf3QCfZdct
Hjr1PgUP6U8X4dLAdd3vXQk=
=T7lw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-06 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1181180051.18444.31.camel@localhost.localdomain>
     [not found] ` <20070607041411.GB1783@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
     [not found]   ` <1181226138.18444.54.camel@localhost.localdomain>
     [not found]     ` <20070607161754.GA11941@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2007-06-07 18:26       ` [PATCH RT] convert RCU Preempt tasklet into softirq Steven Rostedt
2007-06-07 18:51         ` Steven Rostedt
2007-06-07 20:16           ` Steven Rostedt
2007-06-08  4:16             ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-06-08 15:00               ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-06-07 21:02         ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-06-08 15:27           ` Steven Rostedt
2007-06-08 19:36             ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-06-08 19:43               ` Steven Rostedt
2007-06-08 20:00                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2007-09-06 17:52                   ` Clark Williams [this message]
2007-09-06 18:06                     ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46E03E40.80801@redhat.com \
    --to=williams@redhat.com \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=johnstul@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=oleg@tv-sign.ru \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox