From: Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
perex@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [-mm patch] unexport sys_{open,read}
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 00:15:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E5C21C.8040609@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070910221848.GJ3563@stusta.de>
On 09/11/2007 12:18 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 01:17:59PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> There is no benefit in making some rigid set of rules.
>
> Is is considered beneficial to provide API stability for external
> modules or not?
If I may...
Yes, it is. Just not at any significant cost and Andrew is saying that he
considers the _UNUSED() thing not significant.
Rene.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-10 22:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-09 20:25 [-mm patch] unexport sys_{open,read} Adrian Bunk
2007-09-09 20:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-09 21:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-09 22:22 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-09 22:41 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-09-09 23:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-10 9:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-10 9:23 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-10 12:03 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-10 12:31 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-10 12:43 ` Al Viro
2007-09-10 17:25 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-10 17:44 ` Alan Cox
2007-09-10 17:54 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-13 23:23 ` Greg KH
2007-09-10 19:58 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-10 20:17 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-10 22:18 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-10 22:15 ` Rene Herman [this message]
2007-09-10 22:41 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-09-10 22:56 ` Rene Herman
2007-09-10 15:14 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-09-25 21:17 ` Dave Jones
2007-09-10 12:18 ` David Miller
2007-09-10 12:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-18 14:10 ` Adrian Bunk
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-08-22 9:06 2.6.23-rc3-mm1 Andrew Morton
2007-08-27 21:27 ` [-mm patch] unexport sys_{open,read} Adrian Bunk
2007-08-27 22:53 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-08-27 23:17 ` Adrian Bunk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46E5C21C.8040609@gmail.com \
--to=rene.herman@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bunk@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@suse.cz \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox