public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net>
To: Alistair John Strachan <alistair@devzero.co.uk>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 0/4] Virtual Machine Time Accounting
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 10:06:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E64C9D.2000509@bull.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200709101910.36923.alistair@devzero.co.uk>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2352 bytes --]

Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Monday 10 September 2007 14:08:45 Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>> * Laurent Vivier <Laurent.Vivier@bull.net> wrote:
>>>>> Ingo, please, could you have a look to these patches ?
>>>>>
>>>>> The aim of these four patches is to introduce Virtual Machine time
>>>>> accounting.
>>>>>
>>>>> [PATCH 1/4] as recent CPUs introduce a third running state, after
>>>>> "user" and "system", we need a new field, "guest", in cpustat to
>>>>> store the time used by the CPU to run virtual CPU. Modify /proc/stat
>>>>> to display this new field.
>>>> the concept certainly looks sane to me.
>>>>
>>>> The heavy-handed use of #ifdefs uglifies the code to a large degree,
>>>> but this is not a fundamental problem: since basically all distros
>>>> have KVM enabled (and lguest benefits from this too), could you just
>>>> make all this new code unconditional?
>>> I imagine the embedded people will complain... perhaps move all the code
>>> to a #ifdef section above with a full implementation and a stub
>>> implementation.
>> I'm going to repost patches without #ifdefs for readability.
>> Then we could discuss if we should introduce #ifdefs and how.
> 
> If you could provide a summary of the size increase from your latest post 
> (i.e., size of the kernel before and after) that might lay rest to some 
> theoretical complaints.

These patches add:

* at data structures level:

- one cputime64_t (8 bytes) per cpu
- two cputime_t (2 * 4 bytes) per signal_struct and one cputime_t per task_struct

* at processing level:

- display and convert one more value in show_stat() (fs/proc/proc_misc.c)
- display and convert two more values in do_task_stat() (fs/proc/array.c)
- manage (copy and add) one more value in __exit_signal() (kernel/exit.c)
- initialize three more fields in copy_signal (kernel/fork.c)
- add a bit test in account_system_time() and if the bit is set call a new
function (46 bytes on x86_64).

Size of stripped kernel before (on x86_64):
vmlinux 7305064 bytes (not stripped 52643888 bytes)
Size of stripped kernel after:
vmlinux 7305064 bytes (not stripped 52677180 bytes)

means 0 bytes added ????

Laurent
-- 
------------- Laurent.Vivier@bull.net  --------------
          "Software is hard" - Donald Knuth


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2007-09-11  8:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-10 12:02 [RESEND][PATCH 0/4] Virtual Machine Time Accounting Laurent Vivier
2007-09-10 12:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-10 12:15   ` Laurent Vivier
2007-09-10 12:50   ` Avi Kivity
2007-09-10 13:08     ` Laurent Vivier
2007-09-10 18:10       ` Alistair John Strachan
2007-09-11  8:06         ` Laurent Vivier [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46E64C9D.2000509@bull.net \
    --to=laurent.vivier@bull.net \
    --cc=alistair@devzero.co.uk \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox