public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Ivar Rykkelid <jonry@pvv.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:01:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E97AFF.30202@pvv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E953D7.5070305@gmail.com>

Resending, as my first attempts contained HTML and was blocked...

Tejun Heo wrote:
> Jon Ivar Rykkelid wrote:
>   
>> Thanks for the suggestion, but sata_nv is not built modular in my
>> current kernel, so "no can do" at the moment
>> (However, if some expert REALLY thinks this will fix things, I will
>> CERTAINLY recompile and give it a go)
>>     
>
> Passing "sata_nv.adma=0" as kernel boot parameter will do the trick.
>
>   
Ahh, silly me... Of course!
Ooops, I just got back, and verified: I actually have sata_nv running as 
a module after all on this server... My bad.
I fixed /etc/modprobe.conf to include the following two lines:
"
alias scsi_hostadapter sata_nv
options sata_nv adma=0
...
"

I then ran "mkinitrd" (to ensure that the latest options from 
modprobe.conf were included) in the initrd-image that I load at boot.

- Do you guys think this is worth a try? Anyway, I have rebooted now, so 
I'll test it for a few days and let you know - We'll just have to wait 
and see...
Do you think I should re-enable SMART to provoke a failure, or would 
that be to tempt fate too much? (For now I have not re-enabled SMART)

PS: Is there any way of testing / verifying that sata_nv is now running 
with this option? - I am pretty sure I have done it correctly, but I 
would still like to confirm that the proper option has been passed if 
possible.

Thanks
Jon Ivar


  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-13 18:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-13  7:46 sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 14:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-13 15:05   ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 15:14     ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-13 18:01       ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid [this message]
2007-09-13 19:26         ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 19:54           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-13 21:15             ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14  0:37             ` Robert Hancock
2007-09-14 12:10               ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 13:29         ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-09-14 14:17           ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 14:25             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-14 14:39               ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]                 ` <46EAAA9A.1020903@pvv.org>
2007-09-14 15:58                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-14 18:38                     ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 20:24                       ` auxsvr
2007-09-14 20:35             ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-15  7:12               ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-09-15 10:14                 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-15 14:47                   ` John Stoffel
2007-09-15 19:29                     ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
     [not found]                 ` <46EBA82C.6050000@pvv.org>
2007-09-15 11:30                   ` Prakash Punnoor
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-13  7:18 Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13  9:16 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46E97AFF.30202@pvv.org \
    --to=jonry@pvv.org \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox