From: Jon Ivar Rykkelid <jonry@pvv.org>
To: Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
Subject: Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:01:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E97AFF.30202@pvv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46E953D7.5070305@gmail.com>
Resending, as my first attempts contained HTML and was blocked...
Tejun Heo wrote:
> Jon Ivar Rykkelid wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the suggestion, but sata_nv is not built modular in my
>> current kernel, so "no can do" at the moment
>> (However, if some expert REALLY thinks this will fix things, I will
>> CERTAINLY recompile and give it a go)
>>
>
> Passing "sata_nv.adma=0" as kernel boot parameter will do the trick.
>
>
Ahh, silly me... Of course!
Ooops, I just got back, and verified: I actually have sata_nv running as
a module after all on this server... My bad.
I fixed /etc/modprobe.conf to include the following two lines:
"
alias scsi_hostadapter sata_nv
options sata_nv adma=0
...
"
I then ran "mkinitrd" (to ensure that the latest options from
modprobe.conf were included) in the initrd-image that I load at boot.
- Do you guys think this is worth a try? Anyway, I have rebooted now, so
I'll test it for a few days and let you know - We'll just have to wait
and see...
Do you think I should re-enable SMART to provoke a failure, or would
that be to tempt fate too much? (For now I have not re-enabled SMART)
PS: Is there any way of testing / verifying that sata_nv is now running
with this option? - I am pretty sure I have done it correctly, but I
would still like to confirm that the proper option has been passed if
possible.
Thanks
Jon Ivar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-13 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-13 7:46 sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 14:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-13 15:05 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 15:14 ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-13 18:01 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid [this message]
2007-09-13 19:26 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 19:54 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-13 21:15 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 0:37 ` Robert Hancock
2007-09-14 12:10 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 13:29 ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-09-14 14:17 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 14:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-14 14:39 ` Tejun Heo
[not found] ` <46EAAA9A.1020903@pvv.org>
2007-09-14 15:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-14 18:38 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 20:24 ` auxsvr
2007-09-14 20:35 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-15 7:12 ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-09-15 10:14 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-15 14:47 ` John Stoffel
2007-09-15 19:29 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
[not found] ` <46EBA82C.6050000@pvv.org>
2007-09-15 11:30 ` Prakash Punnoor
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-13 7:18 Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 9:16 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46E97AFF.30202@pvv.org \
--to=jonry@pvv.org \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=jeff@garzik.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox