public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jon Ivar Rykkelid <jonry@pvv.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org>,
	Prakash Punnoor <prakash@punnoor.de>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com>,
	Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Subject: Re: sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller
Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2007 21:29:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46EC32B7.7010404@pvv.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18155.61586.118828.112512@stoffel.org>

John Stoffel wrote:
> What happens when you just have ONE disk connected to the motherboard
> controller, and the rest connected to PCI controllers?  Does it crap
> out then?  You've just such a nice repeatable problem across
> motherboards that it's a shame to waste this debugging time.
>   
Sorry, I gave in. I have now abandoned my nvidia trials (both 
motherboards have been returned, and I'm now running with Intel chipset) 
- My current motherboard is less ideal (in terms of PCI-slots etc.), but 
on the other hand it works...
> I'm wondering if it's a PCI bus issue somehow, and that the load on
> the motherboard controller isn't supportable when you have a bunch of
> disks on PCI controllers as well.  Shot in the dark...
>   
That was actually not such a bad idea... Unfortunately it's too late now 
(If not I should have tested for sure). I was/am after all running an 
8-disk SATA array (plus a normal IDE disk - not in the raid). I had 4 
disks running through two PCI-cards and 4 disks used the motherboard's 
controller. - When all 8 disks were connected to the two PCI-cards the 
speed dropped compared to when the motherboard's controller took some 
load.. (So it could maybe be an issue with bandwidth / load ? - I don't 
know.)
> Thanks for all your hard work on this, I know how frustrating it is to
> not have a stable system!
>   
Sorry for giving in, but I felt I was banging my head against the wall 
(and with too few sensible solutions being suggested). Now I guess I'm 
semi-happy that all seems to work OK with the Intel chipset.. 
Frustrating that the sata_nv-driver / nvidia HW didn't work with my 
configuration, though...

Thank you all for your effort as well - hope someone figures this out 
sometime in the future.

All the best
Jon Ivar

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-15 19:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-13  7:46 sata_nv issues with MCP51 SATA controller Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 14:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-13 15:05   ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 15:14     ` Tejun Heo
2007-09-13 18:01       ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 19:26         ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13 19:54           ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-13 21:15             ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14  0:37             ` Robert Hancock
2007-09-14 12:10               ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 13:29         ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-09-14 14:17           ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 14:25             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-14 14:39               ` Tejun Heo
     [not found]                 ` <46EAAA9A.1020903@pvv.org>
2007-09-14 15:58                   ` Jeff Garzik
2007-09-14 18:38                     ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-14 20:24                       ` auxsvr
2007-09-14 20:35             ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-15  7:12               ` Prakash Punnoor
2007-09-15 10:14                 ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-15 14:47                   ` John Stoffel
2007-09-15 19:29                     ` Jon Ivar Rykkelid [this message]
     [not found]                 ` <46EBA82C.6050000@pvv.org>
2007-09-15 11:30                   ` Prakash Punnoor
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-09-13  7:18 Jon Ivar Rykkelid
2007-09-13  9:16 ` Tejun Heo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46EC32B7.7010404@pvv.org \
    --to=jonry@pvv.org \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=htejun@gmail.com \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=john@stoffel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prakash@punnoor.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox