public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk>,
	Satyam Sharma <satyam.sharma@gmail.com>,
	Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Subject: Re: CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading [FIXED]
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 13:00:07 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46F00417.7080301@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070914153216.GA27213@elte.hu>

On 09/14/2007 11:32 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Antoine Martin <antoine@nagafix.co.uk> wrote:
> 
>>>> have an impact) Keep CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG=y to be able to twiddle the
>>>> sysctl.
>> It looks good now! Updated results here:
>> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/Linux-Kernels/Kernels-ManyThreads-CombinedTests5-10msYield-noload.png
>> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/Linux-Kernels/Kernels-ManyThreads-CombinedTests5-10msYield.png
>> Compared with more kernels here - a bit more cluttered:
>> http://devloop.org.uk/documentation/database-performance/Linux-Kernels/Kernels-ManyThreads-CombinedTests4-10msYield-noload.png
>>
>> Thanks Ingo!
>> Does this mean that I'll have to keep doing:
>> echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/sched_yield_bug_workaround
>> Or are you planning on finding a more elegant solution?
> 
> just to make sure - can you get it to work fast with the 
> -rc6+yield-patch solution too? (i.e. not CFS-devel) We need a (tested) 
> solution for 2.6.23 and the CFS-devel patches are not for 2.6.23. I've 
> attached below the latest version of the -rc6 yield patch - the switch 
> is not dependent on SCHED_DEBUG anymore but always available.
> 

Is this going to be merged? And will you be making the default == 1 or
just leaving it at 0, which forces people who want the older behavior to
modify the default?


  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-18 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-09-12 23:10 CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading Antoine Martin
2007-09-13  7:18 ` David Schwartz
2007-09-12 23:33   ` Nick Piggin
2007-09-13 19:02     ` Antoine Martin
2007-09-13 21:47       ` David Schwartz
2007-09-13 11:24 ` CFS: " Ingo Molnar
2007-09-14  8:32   ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-14 10:06     ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-14 15:25       ` CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading [FIXED] Antoine Martin
2007-09-14 15:32         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-18 17:00           ` Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2007-09-18 22:46             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-18 23:02               ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-09-19 18:45                 ` David Schwartz
2007-09-19 19:48                   ` Chris Friesen
2007-09-19 22:56                     ` David Schwartz
2007-09-19 23:05                       ` David Schwartz
2007-09-19 23:52                         ` David Schwartz
2007-09-19 19:18                 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-19 19:39                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-19 19:56                     ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-19 20:26                       ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-19 20:28                       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-19 21:41                         ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-19 21:49                           ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-19 21:58                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-26  1:46                           ` CFS: new java yield graphs Antoine Martin
2007-09-27  8:35                             ` Ingo Molnar
2007-09-19 20:00                   ` CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading [FIXED] Chris Friesen
2007-09-14 16:01       ` CFS: some bad numbers with Java/database threading Satyam Sharma
2007-09-14 16:08         ` Satyam Sharma
2007-09-17 12:17         ` Antoine Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46F00417.7080301@redhat.com \
    --to=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=antoine@nagafix.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=satyam.sharma@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox