Re: [patch 6/7] Linux Kernel Markers - Documentation

[Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>]

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Randy Dunlap (randy.dunlap@oracle.com) wrote:
>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 17:08:30 -0400 Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>
>>> * Randy Dunlap (randy.dunlap@oracle.com) wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007 11:56:35 -0700 Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 11:49:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>>>>>> I think that samples are perfectly fine for documentation and
>>>>>>> that the trace example is a good example.  I think that most people
>>>>>>> who need something like that would need to customize it for their
>>>>>>> specific needs anyway.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> We don't seem to be making progress...
>>>>>> Time to bring in a Tie-Breaker :)
>>>>> Yes.  Is anyone else interested?   :(
>>>>
>>>> I guess that's everyone (except those who are sleeping).
>>>>
>>>> Let's not hold up progress.  Just use samples/ for code.
>>> Would you already have the 
>>>
>>> Makefile
>>> samples/Kconfig
>>> samples/Makefile
>>>
>>> core code handy per chance ? (and probably Kconfig sourcing in every
>>> arch ?)
>> Yes.  Here it is.  I'm working on add kprobes to it, but you
>> can go ahead with markers also.
>>
>>
> 
> Hi Randy,
> 
> I got everything working and I'm thinking about posting all this stuff
> soon. Do you think your patch (having renamed Kbuild to Makefile) is
> ready to post ?

Yes, AFAIK it is.  Do you want me to resend it or do you want to
make it patch M/N in your patches?

-- 
~Randy
Phaedrus says that Quality is about caring.