public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
	"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PCI: Fix boot-time hang on G31/G33 PC
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 11:36:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <46FBF830.9000704@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070927183129.A17565@jurassic.park.msu.ru>

Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 03:20:40PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>> Ivan, your concern is about disabling things like interrupt controllers 
>> and power management chips during probe right?  You're right that doing 
>> that could cause problems if we get and interrupt or PMU event at just 
>> the wrong time, but that could just as easily happen if decode was 
>> still enabled but the BAR had a bogus address programmed (as it would 
>> during probing).
> 
> Yes, nobody is arguing that moving the BAR around is unsafe, but generally
> it's the less of two evils.
> 
> The major problem here is that with IO and MEM bits cleared in the command
> register you disable *all* address decoders on the device, not just ranges
> that have respective BARs. At least this behaviour is required by PCI spec.
> Examples:
> - legacy VGA IO and memory (no corresponding BARs);
> - base/limit registers of P2P bridge;
> - PMU and SMBus registers (sort of normal BARs, but hidden elsewhere
>   in the config space);
> - IDE legacy mode registers;
> - IO-APIC registers (typically sort of read-only BAR).
> 
> For all of these address ranges our current BAR probe is effectively
> a no-op, but disable/re-enable clearly isn't.
> 
>> Ultimately, I don't care much one way or another as long as we can get 
>> the desktop platforms fixed somehow.  I think disabling decode is the 
>> most correct way of doing this, but I'm open to other solutions (this 
>> is the only patch I've seen though that's been tested to solve the 
>> problem).
> 
> There are two other solutions: one is to disable decode selectively,
> only on devices or systems where it's necessary and known to be safe.
> I've posted a patch which introduces "disable_while_probe" pci_dev field
> for that purpose.
> Another one is to delay mmconfig probe until after the PCI probe is done,
> as Matthew suggested, and Robert confirmed that it's feasible.


for everyone who's using this quirk or has the same boot issue: I just confirmed
that the new dg33tl bios update v0287 (released 9/20) fixes the boot issue for my
systems. I encourage everyone to update their BIOS image and see if this works.

Cheers,

Auke

  reply	other threads:[~2007-09-27 18:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-26  1:55 [PATCH] Fix boot-time hang on G31/G33 PC Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-26  4:24 ` Robert Hancock
2007-08-26 12:55   ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-26 14:07     ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-26 17:59       ` Robert Hancock
2007-08-28 17:22         ` Jesse Barnes
2007-08-28 17:59 ` Grant Grundler
2007-08-28 18:28   ` Grant Grundler
2007-09-26 21:18 ` PCI: " Greg KH
2007-09-26 21:55   ` Jesse Barnes
2007-09-26 21:56     ` Greg KH
2007-09-26 22:20       ` Jesse Barnes
2007-09-26 23:04         ` Robert Hancock
2007-09-27 14:31         ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2007-09-27 18:36           ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-09-27 23:13             ` Greg KH
2007-10-12 14:26               ` Vitaliy Gusev
2007-10-12 17:07                 ` Kok, Auke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=46FBF830.9000704@intel.com \
    --to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
    --cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox