From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
jkeating@redhat.com, cebbert@redhat.com, jordan.crouse@amd.com,
pommnitz@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Correct the SMAP check in the e820 probe
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:03:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46FD33DF.2010605@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0709280719010.3579@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> Hmm. If I read this correctly, I don't think this can be right.
>
> Why? You don't mark %edx as possibly corrupted by the asm any more.
>
> The "=dm" means that quite often (probably effectively always), gcc will
> allocate %edx to be the output register for %0, but at least in theory, it
> could easily decide that it's going to put %0 in memory, and in that case,
> it may well decide that %edx is not modified by the asm statement. Which
> may or may not be true - I'd bet that there are BIOSes out there that *do*
> modify it.
>
Yes indeed.
>
> IOW, I think you need to either (a) _force_ gcc to use %edx for the "err"
> return, avoiding this issue, or (b) mark edx clobbered (which in turn
> means that you need to remove it from the output constraint for "err"). I
> suspect (a) is simpler/more straightforward.
>
> I haven't pulled this, so maybe you can just amend the commit in-place,
> and we can avoid?
>
Will do.
-hpa
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-28 17:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-28 8:56 [GIT PULL] Correct the SMAP check in the e820 probe H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-28 14:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-28 15:59 ` Chuck Ebbert
2007-09-28 17:03 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46FD33DF.2010605@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=jkeating@redhat.com \
--cc=jordan.crouse@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pommnitz@yahoo.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox