From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755555AbXI2FcP (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:32:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752988AbXI2Fb6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:31:58 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:47970 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752943AbXI2Fb6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:31:58 -0400 Message-ID: <46FDE348.3010801@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 01:31:52 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Andrew Morton CC: Andy Fleming , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: Spinlock fixes for softirqs References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.9 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org doesn't Andrew have a version of these patches that move the useful patch text into the area where it will get copied into the permanent kernel changelog? also, your PHYLIB patches give no notion at all of proper patch order.