From: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regression in 2.6.23-rc8 - power off failed
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 19:24:07 +0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46FE6E17.6070109@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46FE47C7.6070901@rtr.ca>
Mark Lord wrote:
> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:30:33AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
>>>> Both are bad.
>>>> Two different systems and two different bisections.
>>>> I sent the last step of each.
>>>>>> $ git bisect good Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
>>>>>> [626073132b381684c4983e0d911e9aceb32e2cbc] Assembly header and
>>>>>> main routine for new x86 setup code
>>>>> OK, so which one is the bad one?
>>>> This problem (no power off) persists after pull some minutes ago.
>>>> Sorry for the confusion.
>>>>
>>> I believe there must have been something wrong here (possibly
>>> inconsistent experiments?) This checkin has *zero code changes* from
>>> the previous one (and next one) -- the kernel should have been binarily
>>> identical to the previous one. The code introduced in this checkin
>>> doesn't even get compiled until two checkins later,
>>> 4fd06960f120e02e9abc802a09f9511c400042a5.
>>
>> I have done two bisections simultanously and it was late at night.
>> I start again with a fresh tree and better controlled experiments.
>
> If this is an SMP system, then you could just be getting random results,
> depending upon which CPU is attempting the poweroff.
>
> I have a newish patch in Andrew's tree now to fix SMP poweroff
> (has been broken forever), reproduced here below in case you missed it.
>
> * * *
> We need to disable all CPUs other than the boot CPU (usually 0)
> before attempting to power-off modern SMP machines.
> This fixes the hang-on-poweroff issue on my MythTV SMP box,
> and also on Thomas Gleixner's new toybox.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
> Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---
>
> --- linux/kernel/sys.c.orig 2007-09-13 09:49:11.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux/kernel/sys.c 2007-09-28 15:48:54.000000000 -0400
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
> #include <linux/getcpu.h>
> #include <linux/task_io_accounting_ops.h>
> #include <linux/seccomp.h>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
>
> #include <linux/compat.h>
> #include <linux/syscalls.h>
> @@ -878,6 +879,7 @@
> kernel_shutdown_prepare(SYSTEM_POWER_OFF);
> if (pm_power_off_prepare)
> pm_power_off_prepare();
> + disable_nonboot_cpus();
> sysdev_shutdown();
> printk(KERN_EMERG "Power down.\n");
> machine_power_off();
-static void
-acpi_power_off (void)
-{
- printk("%s called\n",__FUNCTION__);
- /* Some SMP machines only can poweroff in boot CPU */
- set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(0));
ACPI in kernel 2.6.12 did disable non-boot cpus too in powe_off.
Later only comment was left for some reason...
Regards,
Alex.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-29 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-29 0:54 regression in 2.6.23-rc8 - power off failed Wolfgang Erig
2007-09-29 2:59 ` Frans Pop
2007-09-29 3:29 ` Frans Pop
2007-09-29 3:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-29 8:22 ` Wolfgang Erig
2007-09-29 8:30 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-09-29 9:35 ` Wolfgang Erig
2007-09-29 12:40 ` Mark Lord
2007-09-29 15:24 ` Alexey Starikovskiy [this message]
2007-09-29 20:47 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-29 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-10-01 17:55 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-10-01 20:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-09-29 18:07 ` Wolfgang Erig
2007-09-29 19:45 ` Wolfgang Erig
2007-09-29 22:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-10-08 19:47 ` regression in 2.6.23-rc8 - power off failed: solved Wolfgang Erig
2007-09-29 7:46 ` regression in 2.6.23-rc8 - power off failed Alexey Starikovskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46FE6E17.6070109@suse.de \
--to=astarikovskiy@suse.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkml@rtr.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox