From: Pieter Palmers <pieterp@joow.be>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Cc: "Kristian Høgsberg" <krh@redhat.com>,
linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firewire: adopt read cycle timer ABI from raw1394
Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:31:51 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4700BE87.2040107@joow.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <tkrat.4aa1f1b5ce7df936@s5r6.in-berlin.de>
Stefan Richter wrote:
>> This duplicates the read cycle timer feature of raw1394 (added in Linux
>> 2.6.21) in firewire-core's userspace ABI.
>
> Kristian and Pieter, does this simple duplication of the ioctl make
> sense on its own? AFAIU rawiso's iso packet buffers look different from
> fw-cdevs's. It seems to me as if rawiso always put the cycle into a user
> buffer for each iso packet received...
>
> raw1394.h::struct raw1394_iso_packet_info {
> __u32 offset;
> __u16 len;
> __u16 cycle; /* recv only */
> __u8 channel; /* recv only */
> __u8 tag;
> __u8 sy;
> };
>
> raw1394.c::raw1394_iso_recv_packets()
>
> /* copy the packet_infos out */
> for (i = 0; i < upackets.n_packets; i++) {
> if (__copy_to_user(&upackets.infos[i],
> &fi->iso_handle->infos[packet],
> sizeof(struct raw1394_iso_packet_info)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> packet = (packet + 1) % fi->iso_handle->buf_packets;
> }
>
> ...while the Juju ABI returns the cycle only for those packets whose
> fw_cdev_iso_packet.control had the FW_CDEV_ISO_INTERRUPT flag set.
> The cycle is then written out in the fw_cdev_event_iso_interrupt event
> which happens when this particular packet was received. Right?
>
> Pieter, do applications like yours need the cycle counter only for a few
> predetermined packets or for each and every packet?
We need it for every packet for two reasons:
1) it's the only way to determine how many packets were dropped when
packet drops are flagged in the callback
2) we convert the 16-bit SYT timestamp of a packet to a full 32-bit
cycle counter value. This because the range of the 16-bit SYT is too
small (only 16 packets) for systems that have large buffering.
In short: yes we use it for every packet.
Pieter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-01 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-29 8:41 [PATCH] firewire: adopt read cycle timer ABI from raw1394 Stefan Richter
2007-09-29 9:01 ` Stefan Richter
2007-10-01 9:31 ` Pieter Palmers [this message]
2007-10-01 16:03 ` Kristian Høgsberg
2007-10-02 6:45 ` Daniel Wagner
2007-10-05 8:31 ` Pieter Palmers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4700BE87.2040107@joow.be \
--to=pieterp@joow.be \
--cc=krh@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=stefanr@s5r6.in-berlin.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox