From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
To: Davide Libenzi <davidel@xmailserver.org>
Cc: rdunlap@xenotime.net, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
hch@lst.de, geoff@gclare.org.uk, tglx@linutronix.de,
david@hardeman.nu, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>,
subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com, corbet@lwn.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Man page for revised timerfd API
Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 08:50:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47033BA1.7070901@gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0709270944300.763@alien.or.mcafeemobile.com>
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
>> Davide,
>>
>> A further question: what is the expected behavior in the
>> following scenario:
>>
>> 1. Create a timerfd and arm it.
>> 2. Wait until M timer expirations have occurred
>> 3. Modify the settings of the timer
>> 4. Wait for N further timer expirations have occurred
>> 5. read() from the timerfd
>>
>> Does the buffer returned by the read() contain the value
>> N or (M+N)? In other words, should modifying the timer
>> settings reset the expiration count to zero?
>
> Every timerfd_settime() zeroes the tick counter. So in your scenario it'll
> return N.
Thanks Davide.
I modified the first para of the read description to make this clear:
read(2)
If the timer has already expired one or more times
since its settings were last modified using
timerfd_settime(), or since the last successful
read(2), then the buffer given to read(2) returns
an unsigned 8-byte integer (uint64_t) containing
the number of expirations that have occurred.
(In the earlier version of the page the text talked about expirations
"since the timer was created".)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
maintainer of Linux man pages Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7
Want to help with man page maintenance? Grab the latest tarball at
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/docs/manpages/
read the HOWTOHELP file and grep the source files for 'FIXME'.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-03 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-26 7:12 Man page for revised timerfd API Michael Kerrisk
2007-09-26 18:06 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-09-26 21:13 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-09-27 10:35 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-09-27 16:45 ` Davide Libenzi
2007-10-03 6:50 ` Michael Kerrisk [this message]
2007-10-03 8:14 ` Matti Aarnio
2007-10-04 18:19 ` Michael Kerrisk
2007-09-27 8:20 ` Geoff Clare
2007-09-27 10:50 ` Michael Kerrisk
[not found] <20070927072726.50350@gmx.net>
2007-09-27 16:42 ` Davide Libenzi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47033BA1.7070901@gmx.net \
--to=mtk-manpages@gmx.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=david@hardeman.nu \
--cc=davidel@xmailserver.org \
--cc=drepper@redhat.com \
--cc=geoff@gclare.org.uk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox