public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gigabit ethernet power consumption
Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:31:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <470AAFD7.9060002@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071008220720.GF3484@elf.ucw.cz>

Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> I've found that gbit vs. 100mbit power consumption difference is about
> 1W -- pretty significant. (Maybe powertop should include it in the
> tips section? :).
> 
> Energy Star people insist that machines should switch down to 100mbit
> when network is idle, and I guess that makes a lot of sense -- you
> save 1W locally and 1W on the router.
> 
> Question is, how to implement it correctly? Daemon that would watch
> data rates and switch speeds using mii-tool would be simple, but is
> that enough?

you most certainly want to do this in userspace I think.

One of the biggest problems is that link negotiation can take a significant amount
of time, well over several seconds (1 to 3 seconds typical) with gigabit, and
having your ethernet connection go offline for 3 seconds may not be the desired
effect for when you want to get more bandwidth in the first place.

However, when a laptop is in battery mode, switching down from gigabit to 100mbit
makes a lot more sense, so this is something I would recommend. This can be as
easy as changing the advertisement mask of the interface and renegotiating the
link. Userspace could handle that very easily.

Auke

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-08 22:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-08 22:07 gigabit ethernet power consumption Pavel Machek
2007-10-08 22:31 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
2007-10-09  5:18   ` Willy Tarreau
2007-10-09 18:28   ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-10-09 18:41     ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-10 20:44       ` Mark Gross
2007-10-11 15:33         ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-11 11:35       ` K.Prasad
2007-10-11 15:18         ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-10  6:35     ` Oliver Neukum
2007-10-09  5:08 ` Chris Snook
2007-10-09  6:58 ` Oliver Neukum
     [not found] <9c8XH-7gs-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <9c9qN-7Rn-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <9cs0n-3Dc-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <9csjH-43E-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]       ` <9d4yC-5hT-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]         ` <9d7ZJ-2mI-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-10-12  2:08           ` Bodo Eggert
2007-10-12 16:35             ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-12 20:30               ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-12 20:46                 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-17 13:00                   ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-10-17 16:38                     ` Kok, Auke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=470AAFD7.9060002@intel.com \
    --to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox