From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: gigabit ethernet power consumption
Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 01:08:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <470B0CC8.6060303@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071008220720.GF3484@elf.ucw.cz>
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've found that gbit vs. 100mbit power consumption difference is about
> 1W -- pretty significant. (Maybe powertop should include it in the
> tips section? :).
>
> Energy Star people insist that machines should switch down to 100mbit
> when network is idle, and I guess that makes a lot of sense -- you
> save 1W locally and 1W on the router.
>
> Question is, how to implement it correctly? Daemon that would watch
> data rates and switch speeds using mii-tool would be simple, but is
> that enough?
I believe you misspelled "ethtool".
While you're at it, why stop at 100Mb? I believe you save even more power at
10Mb, which is why WOL puts the card in 10Mb mode. In my experience, you
generally want either the maximum setting or the minimum setting when going for
power savings, because of the race-to-idle effect. Workloads that have a
sustained fractional utilization are rare. Right now I'm at home, hooked up to
a cable modem, so anything over 4Mb is wasted, unless I'm talking to the box
across the room, which is rare.
Talk to the NetworkManager folks. This is right up their alley.
-- Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-09 5:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-08 22:07 gigabit ethernet power consumption Pavel Machek
2007-10-08 22:31 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-09 5:18 ` Willy Tarreau
2007-10-09 18:28 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-10-09 18:41 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-10 20:44 ` Mark Gross
2007-10-11 15:33 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-11 11:35 ` K.Prasad
2007-10-11 15:18 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-10 6:35 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-10-09 5:08 ` Chris Snook [this message]
2007-10-09 6:58 ` Oliver Neukum
[not found] <9c8XH-7gs-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9c9qN-7Rn-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9cs0n-3Dc-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9csjH-43E-33@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9d4yC-5hT-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
[not found] ` <9d7ZJ-2mI-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2007-10-12 2:08 ` Bodo Eggert
2007-10-12 16:35 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-12 20:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-12 20:46 ` Kok, Auke
2007-10-17 13:00 ` Lennart Sorensen
2007-10-17 16:38 ` Kok, Auke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=470B0CC8.6060303@redhat.com \
--to=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox