public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Newall <david@davidnewall.com>
To: Gustavo Chain <g@0xff.cl>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reserve N process to root
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2007 23:43:16 +0930	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <470CDDFC.8010307@davidnewall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071010094622.7b8121cf@0xff.cl>

Gustavo Chain wrote:
> El Wed, 10 Oct 2007 15:14:06 +0930
> David Newall <david@davidnewall.com> escribió:
>   
>> Gustavo Chain wrote:
>>     
>>> El Wed, 10 Oct 2007 11:19:27 +0930
>>> David Newall <david@davidnewall.com> escribió:
>>>   
>>>       
>>>> Gustavo Chain wrote:
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>>>> I think it's necessary to reserve some pids to the super user.
>>>>> 5 must be sufficient.
>>>>>       
>>>>>           
>>>> Why?  (Sorry if I missed something.)
>>>>     
>>>>         
>>> ¿ To prevent a posible DoS ?
>>>   
>>>       
>> That was what I thought you had in mind; it protects from some kind
>> of fork bomb, right?  But it doesn't seem useful unless you guarantee 
>> having a process already running (with CAP_SYS_ADMIN) *before* the
>> bomb goes off.
>>     
>
> Not really, because fork bomb will never reach maximum pid possible.
> And root will always have a "slot" to kill desired processes.
>   

This is like pulling teeth: painful.

I don't think you have satisfactorily explained why it's necessary.  "To 
prevent a possible DoS" isn't sufficient by itself.  I think you should 
explain the scenarios you have in mind.


  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-10 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-09 23:48 [PATCH] Reserve N process to root Gustavo Chain
2007-10-10  1:49 ` David Newall
2007-10-10  5:15   ` Gustavo Chain
2007-10-10  5:44     ` David Newall
2007-10-10 13:46       ` Gustavo Chain
2007-10-10 14:13         ` David Newall [this message]
2007-10-10 19:50         ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2007-10-10 21:02           ` g
2007-10-11  0:05           ` David Newall
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-11 21:02 Al Boldi
2007-10-12  2:42 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-10-12  5:37   ` Al Boldi
2007-10-12  5:49     ` Kyle Moffett
2007-10-12  6:29       ` Al Boldi
2007-10-13  1:34         ` Gustavo Chain
2007-10-13  5:01           ` Al Boldi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=470CDDFC.8010307@davidnewall.com \
    --to=david@davidnewall.com \
    --cc=g@0xff.cl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox