From: "Kok, Auke" <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
To: Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev@openvz.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru>,
Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@intel.com>,
linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
"Li, Shaohua" <shaohua.li@intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: PCI: Fix boot-time hang on G31/G33 PC
Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 10:07:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <470FA9D3.2050701@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710121826.54405.vgusev@openvz.org>
Vitaliy Gusev wrote:
> On the 28 September 2007 03:13 Greg KH, wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 11:36:32AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
>>> Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 03:20:40PM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>>>> Ivan, your concern is about disabling things like interrupt
>>>>> controllers and power management chips during probe right? You're
>>>>> right that doing that could cause problems if we get and interrupt or
>>>>> PMU event at just the wrong time, but that could just as easily happen
>>>>> if decode was still enabled but the BAR had a bogus address programmed
>>>>> (as it would during probing).
>>>> Yes, nobody is arguing that moving the BAR around is unsafe, but
>>>> generally it's the less of two evils.
>>>>
>>>> The major problem here is that with IO and MEM bits cleared in the
>>>> command register you disable *all* address decoders on the device, not
>>>> just ranges that have respective BARs. At least this behaviour is
>>>> required by PCI spec. Examples:
>>>> - legacy VGA IO and memory (no corresponding BARs);
>>>> - base/limit registers of P2P bridge;
>>>> - PMU and SMBus registers (sort of normal BARs, but hidden elsewhere
>>>> in the config space);
>>>> - IDE legacy mode registers;
>>>> - IO-APIC registers (typically sort of read-only BAR).
>>>>
>>>> For all of these address ranges our current BAR probe is effectively
>>>> a no-op, but disable/re-enable clearly isn't.
>>>>
>>>>> Ultimately, I don't care much one way or another as long as we can get
>>>>> the desktop platforms fixed somehow. I think disabling decode is the
>>>>> most correct way of doing this, but I'm open to other solutions (this
>>>>> is the only patch I've seen though that's been tested to solve the
>>>>> problem).
>>>> There are two other solutions: one is to disable decode selectively,
>>>> only on devices or systems where it's necessary and known to be safe.
>>>> I've posted a patch which introduces "disable_while_probe" pci_dev
>>>> field for that purpose.
>>>> Another one is to delay mmconfig probe until after the PCI probe is
>>>> done, as Matthew suggested, and Robert confirmed that it's feasible.
>>> for everyone who's using this quirk or has the same boot issue: I just
>>> confirmed that the new dg33tl bios update v0287 (released 9/20) fixes the
>>> boot issue for my systems. I encourage everyone to update their BIOS
>>> image and see if this works.
>
> No, it still doesn't work even with a latest BIOS verstion. I have a computer
> with Intel DQ35MP motherboard. I upgraded BIOS to rev. 0696, released
> Oct 1. But kernel (2.6.22.5) still hangs up. Kernel with this fix patch boots
> and works fine.
please note that your BIOS is completely different than the one posted above. This
may be a clue.
interestingly enough I can attest (somewhat) to this. After the BIOS upgrade
2.6.22 booted just fine without pci=nommconf, but I've had several boot lockups
with 2.6.23-rc8.
So, the issue is still open and Matthew/Jesse's suggested fix becomes much more
attractive to me now.
Greg, I suggest putting this patch back in the "grey" zone
Auke
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-12 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-26 1:55 [PATCH] Fix boot-time hang on G31/G33 PC Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-26 4:24 ` Robert Hancock
2007-08-26 12:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-26 14:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-26 17:59 ` Robert Hancock
2007-08-28 17:22 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-08-28 17:59 ` Grant Grundler
2007-08-28 18:28 ` Grant Grundler
2007-09-26 21:18 ` PCI: " Greg KH
2007-09-26 21:55 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-09-26 21:56 ` Greg KH
2007-09-26 22:20 ` Jesse Barnes
2007-09-26 23:04 ` Robert Hancock
2007-09-27 14:31 ` Ivan Kokshaysky
2007-09-27 18:36 ` Kok, Auke
2007-09-27 23:13 ` Greg KH
2007-10-12 14:26 ` Vitaliy Gusev
2007-10-12 17:07 ` Kok, Auke [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=470FA9D3.2050701@intel.com \
--to=auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru \
--cc=jesse.barnes@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=shaohua.li@intel.com \
--cc=vgusev@openvz.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox