public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Cc: Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@nvidia.com>,
	nedev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: MSI interrupts and disable_irq
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 11:30:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4710901F.8010206@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46FDBCB4.9090802@pobox.com>

Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> I think the scenario you outline is an illustration of the approach's 
> fragility:  disable_irq() is a heavy hammer that originated with INTx, 
> and it relies on a chip-specific disable method (kernel/irq/manage.c) 
> that practically guarantees behavior will vary across MSI/INTx/etc.
>
I checked the code: IRQ_DISABLE is implemented in software, i.e. 
handle_level_irq() only calls handle_IRQ_event() [and then the nic irq 
handler] if IRQ_DISABLE is not set.
OTHO: The last trace looks as if nv_do_nic_poll() is interrupted by an irq.

Perhaps something corrupts dev->irq? The irq is requested with
    request_irq(np->pci_dev->irq, handler, IRQF_SHARED, dev->name, dev)
and disabled with
    disable_irq_lockdep(dev->irq);

Someone around with a MSI capable board? The forcedeth driver does
    dev->irq = pci_dev->irq
in nv_probe(), especially before pci_enable_msi().
Does pci_enable_msi() change pci_dev->irq? Then we would disable the 
wrong interrupt....

--
    Manfred

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-10-13  9:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <46FC15A9.1070803@nvidia.com>
2007-09-29  2:47 ` MSI interrupts and disable_irq Jeff Garzik
2007-09-29  3:08   ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-05 22:12     ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-06  6:23       ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-06 17:43   ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-06 17:59     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-07 16:54       ` Manfred Spraul
2007-10-13  9:30   ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2007-10-14  5:59     ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-14  7:15       ` Manfred Spraul
2007-10-14 19:55         ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-14 21:47         ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-14 23:15           ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-14 23:36             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-15 22:17     ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 17:23       ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-16 17:39         ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 17:59           ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-16 19:44             ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 18:01           ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-17 19:43             ` Manfred Spraul
2007-10-02 19:03 ` Manfred Spraul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4710901F.8010206@colorfullife.com \
    --to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=aabdulla@nvidia.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox