From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762916AbXJOWAc (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:00:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761544AbXJOV7y (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:59:54 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:33092 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761471AbXJOV7x (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:59:53 -0400 Message-ID: <4713E2D6.90801@goop.org> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 14:59:50 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg KH CC: Linus Torvalds , xen-devel@lists.xensource.com, LKML , Andi Kleen , Chris Wright , virtualization@lists.osdl.org, Andrew Morton , Keir Fraser , Stable Kernel Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24 References: <20071015204840.074767068@goop.org> <20071015215406.GA1588@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20071015215406.GA1588@kroah.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH wrote: > Yeah, but you cc:ed all 12 patches to stable@. The majority of which we > don't want to take, right? Which specific ones should stable@ care > about? Crap, sorry about that. I'd just intended to send the overview and the four patches, which have explicit CC: stable lines in the patch descriptions. They are: Subject: [PATCH 06/12] xen: add batch completion callbacks Subject: [PATCH 07/12] xen: deal with stale cr3 values when unpinning pagetables Subject: [PATCH 10/12] xen: fix incorrect vcpu_register_vcpu_info hypercall argument Subject: [PATCH 12/12] xfs: eagerly remove vmap mappings to avoid upsetting Xen J