From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
shemminger@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:2161 net_rx_action()
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:20:09 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4713E799.1070002@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071015220357.GA7174@elte.hu>
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
>> From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
>> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:24:30 +0200
>>
>>> got this warning with Linus' latest -git tree:
>>>
>>> WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:2161 net_rx_action()
>>> [<80564db4>] net_rx_action+0xce/0x186
>>> [<8011ba98>] __do_softirq+0x6c/0xcf
>>> [<8011bb2d>] do_softirq+0x32/0x36
>>> [<8011bcae>] irq_exit+0x35/0x40
>>> [<80104fdb>] do_IRQ+0x5c/0x71
>>> [<801048cd>] do_nmi+0x8f/0x238
>>> [<801033a3>] common_interrupt+0x23/0x30
>>> =======================
>> This is a driver bug, the work "budget" passed into a driver's
>> ->poll() handler should never be exceeded. That's what this warning
>> assertion is checking.
>>
>> What ethernet card is in your system and what driver is being used to
>> drive it?
>
> it's forcedeth.
>
> i've checked nv_napi_poll(), and i dont see how it could return larger
> than 'limit' number of packets.
>
> it could return packets == limit though:
>
> pkts = nv_rx_process_optimized(dev, budget);
> ...
>
> if (pkts < budget) {
> /* re-enable receive interrupts */
> spin_lock_irqsave(&np->lock, flags);
>
> __netif_rx_complete(dev, napi);
>
> ...
> return pkts;
FWIW, forcedeth has this funky disable_irq()-based locking mechanism
that is currently the subject of some kernel.org bugzillas. I would
also check and make sure that isn't perturbing your results (even though
it seems unrelated, based on what I read here). That might include
disabling MSI if it's enabled, and/or turning on spinlock debugging.
Jeff
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-15 22:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-15 11:24 WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:2161 net_rx_action() Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 11:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 16:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 19:57 ` David Miller
2007-10-15 22:03 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 22:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 22:21 ` David Miller
2007-10-15 22:30 ` [patch] forcedeth: fix the NAPI poll function Ingo Molnar
2007-10-15 22:39 ` David Miller
2007-10-15 22:40 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-15 22:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 5:42 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-16 5:47 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 6:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-16 7:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 7:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-16 16:52 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 21:20 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-17 7:25 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-17 10:18 ` [patch] forcedeth: fix the NAPI poll function, take #2 Ingo Molnar
2007-10-18 0:21 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-15 22:18 ` WARNING: at net/core/dev.c:2161 net_rx_action() David Miller
2007-10-15 22:20 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4713E799.1070002@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=shemminger@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox