From: Balbir Singh <balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
stable@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Subject: Re: [stable] 2.6.23 regression: top displaying 9999% CPU usage
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 16:08:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <471494A1.8030504@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710161211.40285.elendil@planet.nl>
Frans Pop wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 October 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
>> I am trying to think out loud as to what the root cause of the problem
>> might be. In one of the discussion threads, I saw utime going backwards,
>> which seemed very odd, I suspect that those are rounding errors.
>
> I only remembered stime going backwards, but looking back at the mails
> you are right, there has been one case of utime going backwards too.
> stime going backwards happens _much_ more frequently.
>
>> I have tried and not had any success reproducing the problem, could you
>> please help me with some pointers/steps to reproduce the problem?
>
> I can reproduce the problem reliably for two KDE programs I have running
> permanently on my system: kontact and amarok. Both of these wake up
> regularly and use some (not very much) processor capacity before going to
> sleep again. Any process that has that that characteristic should do.
>
> /me thinks a bit and tries something
>
> lol - I have just managed to reproduce this with 'top' itself :-P
>
Thanks, I know why I am not seeing the problem. My box has
CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING set. I'll find another box and try.
--
Warm Regards,
Balbir Singh
Linux Technology Center
IBM, ISTL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-16 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-12 20:31 2.6.23 regression: top displaying 9999% CPU usage Frans Pop
2007-10-12 21:22 ` [stable] " Greg KH
2007-10-13 7:53 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-14 20:36 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-16 8:29 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-16 9:30 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-16 10:11 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-16 10:38 ` Balbir Singh [this message]
2007-10-16 10:34 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-16 12:59 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-29 12:05 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-29 12:31 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-29 20:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-29 20:33 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-29 20:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-29 21:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-10-29 21:22 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-29 21:43 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-29 23:19 ` Frans Pop
2007-10-29 23:22 ` Ingo Molnar
2007-10-30 20:22 ` Otavio Salvador
2007-10-29 23:24 ` Balbir Singh
2007-10-30 5:56 ` Christian Borntraeger
2007-10-30 6:00 ` Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=471494A1.8030504@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=elendil@planet.nl \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox