From: John Sigler <linux.kernel@free.fr>
To: Alexey Starikovskiy <aystarik@gmail.com>, len.brown@intel.com
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
robert.moore@intel.com
Subject: Re: halt does not shut the system down
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:59:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4715DCF1.30507@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4715C39E.7070603@gmail.com>
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> John Sigler wrote:
>
>> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>>
>>> John Sigler wrote:
>>>
>>>> +===================================+
>>>> | Soft-Off by PWR-BTTN |
>>>> |-----------------------------------|
>>>> | Instant-Off ..... [v] |
>>>> | Delay 4 Sec. ..... [ ] |
>>>> | |
>>>> |-----------------------------------|
>>>> | ^V:Move ENTER:Accept ESC:Abort |
>>>> +===================================+
>>>>
>>>> 'Instant-Off' is the appropriate setting, right?
>>>
>>> Actually, default should be 4 sec delay. OS should have a chance to
>>> shut down the system...
>>
>> I don't see why this setting would have an impact on the outcome
>> of the 'halt' and 'poweroff' commands.
>>
> Well, it is not possible to tell, what BIOS writer have connected to this flag...
(It sucks to be stuck with a closed proprietary BIOS.)
I tested the other setting, and it didn't change anything.
The system remains powered on after executing poweroff.
Len: the system is 100% Intel (Intel CPU, Intel north bridge, Intel
south bridge, Intel integrated network controllers). Have Intel
engineers run into the same problem on a similar platform?
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9148
Regards.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-08 16:19 halt does not shut the system down John Sigler
2007-10-09 8:06 ` John Sigler
2007-10-09 20:04 ` Remy Bohmer
2007-10-10 9:56 ` John Sigler
2007-10-12 19:29 ` Remy Bohmer
2007-10-10 9:11 ` John Sigler
2007-10-12 9:58 ` John Sigler
2007-10-12 10:41 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-10-12 13:11 ` John Sigler
2007-10-15 10:36 ` John Sigler
2007-10-15 11:11 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-10-15 13:29 ` John Sigler
2007-10-15 14:03 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-10-16 10:51 ` John Sigler
2007-10-16 12:37 ` linux-os (Dick Johnson)
2007-10-16 13:08 ` John Sigler
2007-10-16 17:06 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-10-17 8:09 ` John Sigler
2007-10-17 8:11 ` Alexey Starikovskiy
2007-10-17 9:59 ` John Sigler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4715DCF1.30507@free.fr \
--to=linux.kernel@free.fr \
--cc=aystarik@gmail.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robert.moore@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox