From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760964AbXJQS2a (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:28:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756353AbXJQS2V (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:28:21 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:40298 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755513AbXJQS2V (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Oct 2007 14:28:21 -0400 Message-ID: <47165444.30208@goop.org> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 11:28:20 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] paravirt_ops and xen updates for 2.6.24 References: <47150D5E.6090504@goop.org> <47164C89.60400@goop.org> <20071017180626.GA9307@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20071017180626.GA9307@elte.hu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Ingo Molnar wrote: > hm, could we do the arch/x86 changes via the arch/x86 tree instead? > We've got about a 100 patches pending there now, under QA, preparing > them for pushout. Will check your paravirt patches too, ok? Yep, that's fine. J