From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
Ayaz Abdulla <aabdulla@nvidia.com>,
nedev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: MSI interrupts and disable_irq
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 21:43:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <471665D7.5020607@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <86802c440710161101o34a1b982w95c7473f0ec744ed@mail.gmail.com>
Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> Correct, but the overall point was that MSI-X conceptually conflicts
>> with the existing "lockless" disable_irq() schedule, which was written
>> when there was a one-one relationship between irq, PCI device, and work
>> to be done.
>>
>
> at this point, nic in mcp55 is using msi or INTx.
>
>
Correct.
For msi-x, the driver does three disable_irq() calls to the correct
vectors. ugly, but nevertheless correct.
The bug only affected msi: The driver did disable_irq(<old INTx irq
num>) instead of disable_irq(<new msi-x irq num>).
The patch that I've attached to the bugzilla report 9047 seems to fix
the crash, thus I would propose to apply it to 2.6.23 and 2.6.24. I'll
send a seperate mail.
All other problem [reduce code duplication, less ugly locking, ...]
should be fixed with independant patches.
--
Manfred
> YH
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 19:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <46FC15A9.1070803@nvidia.com>
2007-09-29 2:47 ` MSI interrupts and disable_irq Jeff Garzik
2007-09-29 3:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-10-05 22:12 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-10-06 6:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-06 17:43 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-06 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-07 16:54 ` Manfred Spraul
2007-10-13 9:30 ` Manfred Spraul
2007-10-14 5:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-14 7:15 ` Manfred Spraul
2007-10-14 19:55 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-14 21:47 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-14 23:15 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-14 23:36 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2007-10-15 22:17 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 17:23 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-16 17:39 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 17:59 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-16 19:44 ` Jeff Garzik
2007-10-16 18:01 ` Yinghai Lu
2007-10-17 19:43 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2007-10-02 19:03 ` Manfred Spraul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=471665D7.5020607@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=aabdulla@nvidia.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox