Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git

Jeff Garzik
2007-10-18T08:51:43Z

Jeff Garzik wrote:
> I noticed that
> sg_tablesize in sata_mv is not LIBATA_MAX_PRD. This is expected
> behavior, but I wonder if that difference -- most notably being smaller
> than SCSI_MAX_SG_SEGMENTS -- would trigger any latent bugs.

Another sata_mv difference from the rest: the chip does not support
ATAPI, so we never care about qc->pad

Jeff