From: Roel Kluin <12o3l@tiscali.nl>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
RT <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority is actually changing
Date: Sat, 20 Oct 2007 04:48:59 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <47196C9B.7090909@tiscali.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071017185113.11272.50568.stgit@novell1.haskins.net>
Gregory Haskins wrote:
> We can avoid dirtying a rq related cacheline with a simple check, so why not.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
> ---
>
> 0 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
I think you wanted a patch here?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-20 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-17 18:50 [PATCH 0/9] RT: RT-Overload/Sched enhancements v4 Gregory Haskins
2007-10-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 1/9] RT: push-rt Gregory Haskins
2007-10-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 2/9] RT: Add a per-cpu rt_overload indication Gregory Haskins
2007-10-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 3/9] RT: Wrap the RQ notion of priority to make it conditional Gregory Haskins
2007-10-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 4/9] RT: Initialize the priority value Gregory Haskins
2007-10-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 5/9] RT: Maintain the highest RQ priority Gregory Haskins
2007-10-17 18:50 ` [PATCH 6/9] RT: Clean up some of the push-rt logic Gregory Haskins
2007-10-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 7/9] RT: Add support for low-priority wake-up to push_rt feature Gregory Haskins
2007-10-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] RT: Fixes for push-rt patch Gregory Haskins
2007-10-17 18:51 ` [PATCH 9/9] RT: Only dirty a cacheline if the priority is actually changing Gregory Haskins
2007-10-20 2:48 ` Roel Kluin [this message]
2007-10-20 7:54 ` Steven Rostedt
2007-10-20 10:44 ` Gregory Haskins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=47196C9B.7090909@tiscali.nl \
--to=12o3l@tiscali.nl \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=ghaskins@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox