From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755282AbXJWWUi (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:20:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752062AbXJWWUa (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:20:30 -0400 Received: from gw.goop.org ([64.81.55.164]:36583 "EHLO mail.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751944AbXJWWU3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:20:29 -0400 Message-ID: <471E73AB.4050100@goop.org> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 15:20:27 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "H. Peter Anvin" CC: "Huang, Ying" , Andi Kleen , "Eric W. Biederman" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7 1/3] x86 boot: setup data References: <1193126771.23935.79.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <471E70E0.2090802@goop.org> <471E729F.3000105@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <471E729F.3000105@zytor.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org H. Peter Anvin wrote: > No, he doesn't. The boot protocol version is communication between > the boot loader and the kernel (specifically, it is communication FROM > the kernel TO the bootloader), not between internal bits of the > kernel. Th So the bootloader will only fill out fields the kernel claims to understand? > Since the pointer is safely inside the setup template, even if the > bootloader doesn't understand boot protocol version 2.08 it will have > copied it. OK. J