From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754654AbXJXBQL (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:16:11 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753213AbXJXBP6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:15:58 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:47239 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753005AbXJXBP5 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:15:57 -0400 Message-ID: <471E9CC1.90102@zytor.com> Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 18:15:45 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Huang, Ying" CC: Andi Kleen , "Eric W. Biederman" , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -v7 0/3] x86 boot: 32-bit boot protocol References: <1193126765.23935.74.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <471E7078.4050908@zytor.com> <1193187847.23935.95.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <1193187847.23935.95.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Huang, Ying wrote: > > Do you think it is possible that the 3rd patch of the patchset: document > for 32 bit boot protocol can be merged into upstream firstly? It has > been used by kexec/LinuxBIOS already and the EFI support patches depend > on it too. > Well, the part of it that doesn't document the 2.08 boot protocol, at least, since it documents existing practice. -hpa