From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758776AbXJXNUg (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:20:36 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753084AbXJXNU2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:20:28 -0400 Received: from srv5.dvmed.net ([207.36.208.214]:51391 "EHLO mail.dvmed.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751237AbXJXNU1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:20:27 -0400 Message-ID: <471F4692.1080309@garzik.org> Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2007 09:20:18 -0400 From: Jeff Garzik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Russell King CC: Al Viro , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Linus Torvalds , linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git patches] IDE updates (part 2) References: <200710131825.24768.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20071014001238.GP8181@ftp.linux.org.uk> <4713C568.2060708@garzik.org> <20071015195807.GF8759@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <4713C893.3050200@garzik.org> <20071024123851.GB32333@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> <471F4035.4030507@garzik.org> <20071024131243.GC32333@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> In-Reply-To: <20071024131243.GC32333@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -4.4 (----) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin version 3.1.9 on srv5.dvmed.net summary: Content analysis details: (-4.4 points, 5.0 required) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Russell King wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:53:09AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >> Russell King wrote: >>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 04:07:47PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>>> Russell King wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 03:54:16PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: >>>>>> Al Viro wrote: >>>>>>> Proposed addition to icside part, provided that ARM folks ACK it - gets >>>>>>> icside to build and AFAICS it's correct: >>>>>> ACK from me too... ARM folks? >>>>> Will test tomorrow/Wednesday. >>>> Thanks. Sorry about missing your CC on the libata-wide ata_link >>>> changes. We should have poked the maintainers on that, for the drivers >>>> we cannot build ourselves. >>> I think Viro's patch got an ack from everyone. Who's dealing with getting >>> this regression fix into mainline? It seems at the moment the patch is in >>> limbo. >> I was waiting on you, who last said "Will test tomorrow/Wednesday" (with >> presumably an ACK forthcoming after test results) >> >> If it now has your ACK, it's ready and waiting in my mbox queue to be >> merged upstream. > > Looks like it got my ack more than a week ago: Groovy. Jeff