From: Tim Bird <tim.bird@am.sony.com>
To: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>
Subject: IRQ off latency of printk is very high
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 12:44:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4720F21F.9090404@am.sony.com> (raw)
I've been looking at 'IRQ off' latency in the Linux kernel, on
version 2.6.22 for target using an ARM processor.
I use a serial console, at 115200 bps.
I've noticed that calls to printk disable interrupts for
excessively long times. I have a long test printk of
over 200 chars, that holds interrupts off for 24 milliseconds.
The kernel drops ticks in this case. I changed to HZ=1000
to more easily see the dropped ticks, and I'm losing about
23 ticks (no surprise there).
I see long interrupt off periods for vprintk and release_console_sem,
both in kernel/printk.c
Results with HRT disabled, HZ=1000:
Below is output from a test printk I inserted into sys_sync().
I have PRINTK_TIMES turned on.
/proc # sync
[ 2292.851106] I'm now in the sys_sync system call, performing an extremely long
printk with lots of words that go on and on and on and if it gets any longer I
just might scream but that's beside the point, as a test of interrupt disable ti
me for the printk system itself.
[ 2292.895751] interval=44816825, jiffies=22
[ 2292.904529] This is a shorter string - will we drop jiffies here??
[ 2292.933729] interval=29173886, jiffies=23
/proc # sync
[ 2296.353092] I'm now in the sys_sync system call, performing an extremely long
printk with lots of words that go on and on and on and if it gets any longer I
just might scream but that's beside the point, as a test of interrupt disable ti
me for the printk system itself.
[ 2296.377637] interval=24573237, jiffies=1
[ 2296.381856] This is a shorter string - will we drop jiffies here??
[ 2296.388356] interval=6488141, jiffies=1
--------------------------
Data from irq_latency measurement tool
Notes:
* 24 ms vprintk = long printk
* 6 ms printk = shorter printk
* 4 ms printk = timing report printks
* I don't know what the heck that preempt_schedule_irq is doing in there.
I only saw that once, on this test.
/proc # cat irq_latency
irq latency worst 20 @ CPU 0
filter: 0
0.024348 vprintk
0.024348 vprintk
0.024343 vprintk
0.006439 vprintk
0.006439 vprintk
0.006338 vprintk
0.004260 preempt_schedule_irq
0.004248 vprintk
0.004248 vprintk
0.004247 vprintk
0.004072 vprintk
0.003966 vprintk
0.000345 latency_start
0.000158 mpu_timer1 26
0.000157 mpu_timer1 26
0.000157 mpu_timer1 26
0.000156 mpu_timer1 26
0.000151 mpu_timer1 26
0.000150 mpu_timer1 26
0.000150 mpu_timer1 26
It looks like vprintk() holds off interrupts for the entire
duration of outputting the data to the serial console.
release_console_sem() appears to as well.
The local_irq_save and restore appear to have been added
in February, 2007 by Mathieu.
Are these are really needed, with all this other locking
going on? Any ideas for fixing this?
-- Tim
=============================
Tim Bird
Architecture Group Chair, CE Linux Forum
Senior Staff Engineer, Sony Corporation of America
=============================
next reply other threads:[~2007-10-25 19:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-25 19:44 Tim Bird [this message]
2007-10-25 20:19 ` IRQ off latency of printk is very high Matt Mackall
2007-10-25 21:15 ` Tim Bird
2007-10-25 22:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-10-25 22:52 ` Tim Bird
2007-10-25 23:12 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-25 23:41 ` Tim Bird
2007-10-26 1:23 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-26 12:57 ` Benny Amorsen
2007-10-26 20:28 ` Matt Mackall
2007-10-29 18:54 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-01 15:27 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2007-11-01 21:11 ` Pavel Machek
2007-11-01 22:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4720F21F.9090404@am.sony.com \
--to=tim.bird@am.sony.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox