Re: Old version of lilo fails to boot 2.6.23

H. Peter Anvin
2007-10-26T18:38:17Z

Joseph Parmelee wrote:
>
> This patch will work in my particular case, though it appears to violate
> the rules about getting too close to the EBDA (SP=0xB000 on entry).
>
> The boot loader is responsible for loading the kernel loader at a suitable
> location in low memory, but I don't understand why the boot loader
> should be
> involved in setting the stack at all. If we explicitly allocate the stack
> as part of the .data segment, why not just play it safe and in all cases
> fully set up the stack in header.S? This insures that the stack pointer is
> not zero, is as low as possible to stay out of the EBDA, and that ss=ds;
> quite irrespective of what the boot loader does.
>
> What am I missing?
>

What you're missing is that "just loading into a suitable location in
low memory" isn't a sufficient condition. This is something that one
finds out very quickly trying to do boot loader work.

Heap and stack control the amount of functionality that is available,
and therefore the protocol allows them to be dynamic.

Anyway, the final version of the patch that I sent you privately uses
this logic:

- If heap size is properly reported, use it.
- Otherwise, if %ss == %ds, then use the stack pointer as entered.
- Otherwise, use the minimum stack.

This seems like a fairly reasonable compromise, especially since
anything even remotely modern will be handled by the first clause.

-hpa