From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758251AbXJZTlS (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:41:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751168AbXJZTlK (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:41:10 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:33623 "EHLO terminus.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751001AbXJZTlJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 15:41:09 -0400 Message-ID: <47224295.2020406@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 12:40:05 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Eric W. Biederman" CC: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Rusty Russell , Vivek Goyal , James Bottomley , Zachary Amsden , Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Fix boot protocol KEEP_SEGMENTS check. References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Eric W. Biederman wrote: > The kernel only ever supports 1 version of the boot protocol > so there is no need to check the boot protocol revision to > see if a feature is supported. > > Both x86 and x86_64 support the same boot protocol so we need > to implement the KEEP_SEGMENTS on x86_64 as well. It isn't > just paravirt bootloaders that could use this functionality. > > Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman > Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge > Cc: Rusty Russell > Cc: H. Peter Anvin > Cc: Vivek Goyal > Cc: James Bottomley > Cc: Zachary Amsden > Cc: Andi Kleen > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Ingo Molnar Btw, Acked-by: H. Peter Anvin