* Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines @ 2007-10-29 11:20 Yoav Artzi 2007-10-29 12:11 ` Andi Kleen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Yoav Artzi @ 2007-10-29 11:20 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Hi, I am researching now about the Linux kernel memory on 64-bit (x86_64) machines. I am looking into answering the following questions: 1. Is there a user-kernel split on 64-bit memories? If so, how is it done? What is the size of each part? 2. Does kernel high memory exists on 64-bit machines? 3. How is it possible to detect in runtime the split and the size of the physical memory? Thanks, Yoav ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines 2007-10-29 11:20 Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines Yoav Artzi @ 2007-10-29 12:11 ` Andi Kleen [not found] ` <4725EC21.7000603@checkpoint.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2007-10-29 12:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yoav Artzi; +Cc: linux-kernel Yoav Artzi <yoavar@checkpoint.com> writes: > I am researching now about the Linux kernel memory on 64-bit (x86_64) > machines. I am looking into answering the following questions: > > 1. Is there a user-kernel split on 64-bit memories? If so, how is it > done? What is the size of each part? See Documentation/x86_64/mm.txt. Note it changed in 2.6.11. -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <4725EC21.7000603@checkpoint.com>]
[parent not found: <20071029150035.GA30851@one.firstfloor.org>]
[parent not found: <4725F6F7.6020702@checkpoint.com>]
* Re: Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines [not found] ` <4725F6F7.6020702@checkpoint.com> @ 2007-10-29 15:48 ` Andi Kleen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Andi Kleen @ 2007-10-29 15:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Yoav Artzi; +Cc: Andi Kleen, linux-kernel On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 05:06:31PM +0200, Yoav Artzi wrote: > I don't know what befell me. I realized the foolishness of the questions > a second after clicking the send button. > > > Now, I just wonder what will happen when people will need more then > 2^46bytes of memory. Any idea? The CPU needs to be extended then beyond 48bit VA. (actually it could be extended to 2^46.5 or so) > > Another two issues: > > 1. I see vmalloc() doesn't cover the entire possible space. Why is that? It needs an reserved space for its virtual mappings. > > 2. How come user space gets 47bits and kernel only gets 46bits in direct > mapping? Half of the kernel space is reserved for special purposes (vmalloc, ioremap etc.) That is not fixed and could be varied. -Andi ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-29 15:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-29 11:20 Linux kernel memory and split on 64-bit machines Yoav Artzi
2007-10-29 12:11 ` Andi Kleen
[not found] ` <4725EC21.7000603@checkpoint.com>
[not found] ` <20071029150035.GA30851@one.firstfloor.org>
[not found] ` <4725F6F7.6020702@checkpoint.com>
2007-10-29 15:48 ` Andi Kleen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox