From: tgh <wwwwww4187@sina.com.cn>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@sous-sol.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [patch 30/44] xen: Add support for preemption
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:23:50 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4727D926.6050004@sina.com.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4727690F.4030502@goop.org>
Thank for your reply
and I still have several questions
> Yes, that's the normal mode of operation. The hypervisor will timeslice
> multiple vcpus onto a single vcpu.
>
that is ,the VM could be preempted by xen,and could xen hypervisor also
be preempted to reschedule other vm or xen kernel thread?and are there
the counterpart abstractions in xen for kernel thread in linux?
> This patch doesn't relate to that; it's whether a Xen Linux guest's
> kernel can be preempted to reschedule processes while running under Xen.
>
that is ,the patch makes the guest's kernel, rather than xen, be able to
be preempted ,is it right?
Thanks in advance
> The normal xen-unstable or vendor Xen kernels don't support this, but
> the mainline kernel with paravirt_ops/xen support does.
>
> J
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 1:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070716231536.937393000@xensource.com>
[not found] ` <20070716232912.409821000@xensource.com>
2007-07-17 0:41 ` [Xen-devel] [patch 03/44] usermodehelper: split setup from execution Rusty Russell
2007-07-17 0:57 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[not found] ` <20070716232914.029797000@xensource.com>
2007-07-17 0:45 ` [Xen-devel] [patch 17/44] Add nosegneg capability to the vsyscall page notes Rusty Russell
2007-07-17 1:04 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[not found] ` <20070716232916.472694000@xensource.com>
2007-07-17 1:07 ` [patch 37/44] xen: add virtual network device driver Jeff Garzik
2007-07-17 8:45 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-07-17 14:28 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-07-17 23:45 ` Rusty Russell
2007-07-18 0:40 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
[not found] ` <20070716232915.672717000@xensource.com>
2007-10-30 9:10 ` [Xen-devel] [patch 30/44] xen: Add support for preemption tgh
2007-10-30 17:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-31 1:23 ` tgh [this message]
2007-10-31 1:38 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-10-31 6:11 ` tgh
2007-10-31 15:07 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4727D926.6050004@sina.com.cn \
--to=wwwwww4187@sina.com.cn \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.com \
--cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
--cc=jeremy@goop.org \
--cc=jeremy@xensource.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xensource.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox