public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	rusty@rustcorp.com.au, ak@suse.de, mingo@elte.hu,
	chrisw@sous-sol.org, avi@qumranet.com, anthony@codemonkey.ws,
	virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, lguest@ozlabs.org,
	kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, zach@vmware.com,
	tglx@linutronix.de, jun.nakajima@intel.com, glommer@gmail.com,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/16] make vsmp a paravirt client
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:38:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47295846.8000700@goop.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193858187364-git-send-email-gcosta@redhat.com>

Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> This patch makes vsmp a paravirt client. It now uses the whole
> infrastructure provided by pvops. When we detect we're running
> a vsmp box, we change the irq-related paravirt operations (and so,
> it have to happen quite early), and the patching function
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> Acked-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xensource.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64    |    3 +-
>  arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c |    3 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c  |   72 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  include/asm-x86/setup.h    |    3 +-
>  4 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64 b/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64
> index 04734dd..544bad5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig.x86_64
> @@ -148,15 +148,14 @@ config X86_PC
>  	bool "PC-compatible"
>  	help
>  	  Choose this option if your computer is a standard PC or compatible.
> -
>  config X86_VSMP
>  	bool "Support for ScaleMP vSMP"
>  	depends on PCI
> +	select PARAVIRT
>  	 help
>  	  Support for ScaleMP vSMP systems.  Say 'Y' here if this kernel is
>  	  supposed to run on these EM64T-based machines.  Only choose this option
>  	  if you have one of these machines.
> -
>  endchoice
>  
>  choice
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> index 44a11e3..c522549 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup_64.c
> @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
>  
>  	init_memory_mapping(0, (end_pfn_map << PAGE_SHIFT));
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_VSMP
> +	vsmp_init();
> +#endif
>  	dmi_scan_machine();
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> index 414caf0..547d3b3 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/vsmp_64.c
> @@ -8,18 +8,70 @@
>   *
>   * Ravikiran Thirumalai <kiran@scalemp.com>,
>   * Shai Fultheim <shai@scalemp.com>
> + * Paravirt ops integration: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@redhat.com>
>   */
> -
>  #include <linux/init.h>
>  #include <linux/pci_ids.h>
>  #include <linux/pci_regs.h>
>  #include <asm/pci-direct.h>
>  #include <asm/io.h>
> +#include <asm/paravirt.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Interrupt control for the VSMP architecture:
> + */
> +
> +static inline unsigned long vsmp_save_fl(void)
>   

No point being inline.

> +{
> +	unsigned long flags = native_save_fl();
> +
> +	if (flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
> +		return X86_EFLAGS_IF;
>   

Is this right, or should the if be testing _AC?  Otherwise, why not just
"return flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF"?

> +	return 0;
> +}
>  
> -static int __init vsmp_init(void)
> +static inline void vsmp_restore_fl(unsigned long flags)
> +{
> +	if (flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF)
> +		flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_AC;
> +	if (!(flags & X86_EFLAGS_IF))
> +		flags &= X86_EFLAGS_AC;
>   

Just use "else"?

> +	native_restore_fl(flags);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void vsmp_irq_disable(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags = native_save_fl();
> +
> +	vsmp_restore_fl((flags & ~X86_EFLAGS_IF));
>   

((double paren?))

> +}
> +
> +static inline void vsmp_irq_enable(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long flags = native_save_fl();
> +
> +	vsmp_restore_fl((flags | X86_EFLAGS_IF));
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned __init vsmp_patch(u8 type, u16 clobbers, void *ibuf,
> +				  unsigned long addr, unsigned len)
> +{
> +	switch (type) {
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.irq_enable):
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.irq_disable):
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.save_fl):
> +	case PARAVIRT_PATCH(pv_irq_ops.restore_fl):
> +		return paravirt_patch_default(type, clobbers, ibuf, addr, len);
> +	default:
> +		return native_patch(type, clobbers, ibuf, addr, len);
> +	}
> +
> +}
> +
> +int __init vsmp_init(void)
>  {
>  	void *address;
> -	unsigned int cap, ctl;
> +	unsigned int cap, ctl, cfg;
>  
>  	if (!early_pci_allowed())
>  		return 0;
> @@ -29,8 +81,16 @@ static int __init vsmp_init(void)
>  	    (read_pci_config_16(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_DEVICE_ID) != PCI_DEVICE_ID_SCALEMP_VSMP_CTL))
>  		return 0;
>  
> +	/* If we are, use the distinguished irq functions */
> +	pv_irq_ops.irq_disable = vsmp_irq_disable;
> +	pv_irq_ops.irq_enable  = vsmp_irq_enable;
> +	pv_irq_ops.save_fl  = vsmp_save_fl;
> +	pv_irq_ops.restore_fl  = vsmp_restore_fl;
> +	pv_init_ops.patch = vsmp_patch;
> +
>  	/* set vSMP magic bits to indicate vSMP capable kernel */
> -	address = ioremap(read_pci_config(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0), 8);
> +	cfg = read_pci_config(0, 0x1f, 0, PCI_BASE_ADDRESS_0);
> +	address = early_ioremap(cfg, 8);
>  	cap = readl(address);
>  	ctl = readl(address + 4);
>  	printk("vSMP CTL: capabilities:0x%08x  control:0x%08x\n", cap, ctl);
> @@ -42,8 +102,6 @@ static int __init vsmp_init(void)
>  		printk("vSMP CTL: control set to:0x%08x\n", ctl);
>  	}
>  
> -	iounmap(address);
> +	early_iounmap(address, 8);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -
> -core_initcall(vsmp_init);
> diff --git a/include/asm-x86/setup.h b/include/asm-x86/setup.h
> index 071e054..dd7996c 100644
> --- a/include/asm-x86/setup.h
> +++ b/include/asm-x86/setup.h
> @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ void __init add_memory_region(unsigned long long start,
>  
>  extern unsigned long init_pg_tables_end;
>  
> -
> +/* For EM64T-based VSMP machines */
> +int vsmp_init(void);
>  
>  #endif /* __i386__ */
>  #endif /* _SETUP */
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-01  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-31 19:14 [PATCH 0/7] (Re-)introducing pvops for x86_64 - Real pvops work part Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14 ` [PATCH 1/16] Wipe out traditional opt from x86_64 Makefile Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14   ` [PATCH 2/16] paravirt hooks at entry functions Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14     ` [PATCH 3/16] read/write_crX, clts and wbinvd for 64-bit paravirt Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14       ` [PATCH 4/16] provide native irq initialization function Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14         ` [PATCH 5/16] report ring kernel is running without paravirt Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14           ` [PATCH 6/16] export math_state_restore Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14             ` [PATCH 7/16] native versions for set pagetables Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14               ` [PATCH 8/16] add native functions for descriptors handling Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14                 ` [PATCH 9/16] This patch add provisions for time related functions so they Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14                   ` [PATCH 10/16] export cpu_gdt_descr Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14                     ` [PATCH 11/16] turn priviled operation into a macro in head_64.S Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14                       ` [PATCH 12/16] tweak io_64.h for paravirt Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14                         ` [PATCH 13/16] native versions for page table entries values Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:14                           ` [PATCH 14/16] prepare x86_64 architecture initialization for paravirt Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:15                             ` [PATCH 15/16] consolidation of paravirt for 32 and 64 bits Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-10-31 19:15                               ` [PATCH 16/16] make vsmp a paravirt client Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-11-01  4:38                                 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge [this message]
2007-11-01  4:50                       ` [PATCH 11/16] turn priviled operation into a macro in head_64.S Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-01 13:50                         ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-11-01  4:48       ` [PATCH 3/16] read/write_crX, clts and wbinvd for 64-bit paravirt Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-01 13:48         ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-11-01 15:30           ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-01 16:07             ` Keir Fraser
2007-11-01 16:13               ` Glauber de Oliveira Costa
2007-11-01 17:41               ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2007-11-01 16:55                 ` [Lguest] " Zachary Amsden
2007-11-02  1:21                   ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47295846.8000700@goop.org \
    --to=jeremy@goop.org \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
    --cc=avi@qumranet.com \
    --cc=chrisw@sous-sol.org \
    --cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
    --cc=glommer@gmail.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=lguest@ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=zach@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox