public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Module init call vs symbols exporting race?
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 12:20:58 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <473031FA.2060707@openvz.org> (raw)

Hi.

I looked at the sys_init_module() and found that the ->init callback
for the module is called without the module_mutex held and *after*
the module's symbols are exported. Doesn't this create the race when
loading two modules in parallel? Like this.

Consider the first module to be (without any internal locking for
simplicity)

=== foo.c ===
static struct list_head foo_list;

void foo_register(struct list_head *elem)
{
	list_add(elem, &foo_list);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(foo_register);

static int foo_init(void)
{
	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&foo_list);
}
module_init(foo_init);
===

and the second one

=== bar.c ===
struct bar_struct {
	struct list_head list;
	...
} bar;

static int bar_init(void)
{
	foo_register(&bar.list);
}
module_init(bar_init);
===

If I understand the sys_init_module() right, the following code
flow is possible:

1CPU                                        2CPU
sys_init_module(/* foo module */)           sys_init_module(/* bar module */)
  mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
  load_module();
      /* export the foo_init here */
  mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
                                            mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
                                            load_module();
                                                /* resolve the foo_init here */
                                            mutex_unlock(&mudule_mutex);
                                            mod->init(); /* bar_init */
           /*
            * OOPS! The foo_list is not ready yet, because the foo_init
            * is not called yet.
            */
  mod->init(); /* foo_init... too late */

Is this analysis correct?

Thanks,
Pavel

             reply	other threads:[~2007-11-06  9:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-06  9:20 Pavel Emelyanov [this message]
2007-11-06 12:41 ` Module init call vs symbols exporting race? Rusty Russell
2007-11-07 10:01   ` Jan Glauber
2007-11-08  2:10     ` Rusty Russell
2007-11-09 11:44       ` Jon Masters
2007-11-09 12:16         ` Jan Glauber
2007-11-10  7:27           ` Rusty Russell
2007-11-12 14:03             ` Jan Glauber
2007-11-09 16:06       ` Jan Glauber
2007-11-10 20:23     ` Andi Kleen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=473031FA.2060707@openvz.org \
    --to=xemul@openvz.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox