From: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@qumranet.com>, Dor Laor <dor.laor@qumranet.com>,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Use of virtio device IDs
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 11:16:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4730A15A.6070001@us.ibm.com> (raw)
Hi Rusty,
I've written a PCI virtio transport and noticed something strange. All
current in-tree virtio devices register ID tables that match a specific
device ID, but any vendor ID.
This is incompatible with using PCI vendor/device IDs for virtio
vendor/device IDs since vendors control what device IDs mean. A simple
solution would be to assign a fixed vendor ID to all current virtio
devices. This doesn't solve the problem completely though since you
would create a conflict between the PCI vendor ID space and the virtio
vendor ID space.
The only solutions seem to be virtualizing the virtio vendor/device IDs
(which is what I'm currently doing) or to mandate that the virtio vendor
ID be within the PCI vendor ID space. It's probably not necessary to
make the same requirement for device IDs though.
What are your thoughts?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next reply other threads:[~2007-11-06 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-06 17:16 Anthony Liguori [this message]
2007-11-06 18:49 ` Use of virtio device IDs Anthony Liguori
2007-11-07 3:38 ` Gregory Haskins
2007-11-07 5:40 ` Avi Kivity
2007-11-07 6:09 ` Rusty Russell
2007-11-07 6:29 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-11-07 17:33 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-11-07 20:38 ` Gregory Haskins
2007-11-08 6:37 ` Avi Kivity
2007-11-08 9:17 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2007-11-08 16:40 ` Anthony Liguori
2007-11-13 13:18 ` Gregory Haskins
2007-11-13 13:59 ` Zachary Amsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4730A15A.6070001@us.ibm.com \
--to=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=dor.laor@qumranet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox