From: David Newall <david@davidnewall.com>
To: ciol <ciol13@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:08:06 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4733113E.4090806@davidnewall.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fgtfqa$h9j$1@ger.gmane.org>
ciol wrote:
> * Do you think the megafreeze development model [1] and the "I don't
> trust in upstream" development model are broken? (And why)
I'm new to LKML, and because this is "my first release" I've held off
saying that the development model scares me. No doubt I need to see it
through a couple of releases, minimum. If I was less sanguine I might
say something about how often "this is tested and ready to be pushed
upstream" presages "the system is broken and doesn't work." I think if
most CIOs monitored the list they'd never let Linux anywhere near their
business systems. It's scary!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-08 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-07 22:56 [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken? ciol
2007-11-07 23:06 ` Rik van Riel
2007-11-07 23:11 ` ciol
2007-11-08 1:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-08 20:45 ` ciol
2007-11-08 6:18 ` Stephen Hemminger
2007-11-08 13:38 ` David Newall [this message]
2007-11-08 14:26 ` Chris Snook
2007-11-08 20:41 ` ciol
2007-11-09 0:15 ` Chris Snook
2007-11-12 11:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2007-11-12 13:51 ` Tuomo Valkonen
2007-11-12 15:20 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-12 16:02 ` Tuomo Valkonen
2007-11-12 16:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-12 17:16 ` Tuomo Valkonen
2007-11-12 17:34 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-12 17:42 ` Tuomo Valkonen
2007-11-13 10:11 ` David Newall
2007-11-12 17:37 ` Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
2007-11-12 17:53 ` Tuomo Valkonen
2007-11-13 12:28 ` Radoslaw Szkodzinski
2007-11-13 13:09 ` Tuomo Valkonen
2007-11-12 16:13 ` Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
2007-11-12 17:14 ` Adrian Bunk
2007-11-12 17:18 ` Tuomo Valkonen
2007-11-12 23:39 ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2007-11-13 0:12 ` Tuomo Valkonen
2007-11-12 17:30 ` david
2007-11-12 18:25 ` Rogelio M. Serrano Jr.
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4733113E.4090806@davidnewall.com \
--to=david@davidnewall.com \
--cc=ciol13@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox