From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S1760719AbXKHO2z@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1760719AbXKHO2z (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:28:55 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752087AbXKHO2r
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:28:47 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:53361 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1758362AbXKHO2q (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:28:46 -0500
Message-ID: <47331CA2.9000403@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2007 09:26:42 -0500
From: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070727)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ciol <ciol13@gmail.com>
CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
References: <fgtfqa$h9j$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <fgtfqa$h9j$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

ciol wrote:
> Hi, I'd like to ask you a few questions:
> 
> * Do you like the way linux distributions integrate the kernel?
> 
> * Wouldn't you prefer they ship with the stable and still maintained 
> 2.6.16.X, while providing optionally the latest kernel for those who 
> want or just have a new hardware?
> 
> * Do you think the megafreeze development model [1] and the "I don't 
> trust in upstream" development model are broken? (And why)

Why are you asking the developers?  We do this for the sake of the users.

	-- Chris