public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Piel <Eric.Piel@lifl.fr>
To: trenn@suse.de
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Kernel panic at boot with ondemand governor as default	(2.6.24-rc2)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:02:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <47385D05.20705@lifl.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1194859012.4590.595.camel@queen.suse.de>

11/12/2007 10:16 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote/a écrit:
> On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 20:10 +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I've tried kernel 2.6.24-rc2 and I have a problem with the new option 
>> for setting up the cpufreq ondemand governor as default: a kernel panic 
>> happens early at boot time. If I boot first with performance governor 
>> and later change to ondemand, everything is fine (as usual).
>>
>> This seems related to the delayed_workqueue. The kernel panic message 
>> finishes by:
>> EIP: [<c012aa60>] wq_per_cpu+0x0/0x10 SS:ESP 0068:c191be58
>> Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
>>
>> A picture of the whole message is available here:
>> http://pieleric.free.fr/unorder/1162-ondemand-panic.jpg
>>
>> My computer is a x86 using speedstep-ich, and you can find the full 
>> .config leading to the panic attached.
>>
>> Does anyone has any idea was it going wrong?
> 
> Does it work if you compile speedstep-ich as a module?
> If you load it, ondemand governor should still be set up automatically.
> If this works, could it be that the kernel does not like that
> queue_delayed_work_on is called that early?

Yes, it works if I compile speedstep-ich as module. I've put the module 
in initramfs and as soon it is loaded, the ondemand governor is selected 
and works.

However, do you think it's ok to prevent cpufreq drivers to be built-in 
if ondemand governor is selected as default? Another way would be to 
reorganise the initialisation code so that workqueue is initialised 
before the cpufreq framework is started, do you think it's possible?

See you,
Eric


  reply	other threads:[~2007-11-12 14:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-11-11 19:10 Kernel panic at boot with ondemand governor as default (2.6.24-rc2) Eric Piel
2007-11-11 22:45 ` Arjan van de Ven
2007-11-12  0:38   ` Eric Piel
2007-11-12  9:16 ` Thomas Renninger
2007-11-12 14:02   ` Eric Piel [this message]
2007-11-12 15:23     ` Thomas Renninger
2007-11-12 20:26       ` Dave Jones
2007-11-12 23:09         ` Eric Piel
2007-11-15 23:37       ` Eric Piel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=47385D05.20705@lifl.fr \
    --to=eric.piel@lifl.fr \
    --cc=davej@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trenn@suse.de \
    --cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox